Catalysts

ABSTRACT

Claimed are metallocene-complexes of formula (I) [formula (I′)] wherein M is Hf or Zr, L is a bridge comprising 1-2 C- or Si-atoms, The other variables are as defined in the claims.

This invention relates to new bisindenyl ligands, complexes thereof andcatalysts comprising those complexes. The invention also relates to theuse of the new bisindenyl metallocene catalysts for the production ofpolypropylene homopolymers or propylene copolymers, especially withethylene, with high activity levels, high molecular weight, and hencelow MFR, and with ideal melting points. The catalysts are especiallyuseful in the manufacture of propylene ethylene copolymers as theyexhibit remarkable catalyst activity in such polymerisations.

Metallocene catalysts have been used to manufacture polyolefins for manyyears. Countless academic and patent publications describe the use ofthese catalysts in olefin polymerisation. Metallocenes are now usedindustrially and polyethylenes and polypropylenes in particular areoften produced using cyclopentadienyl based catalyst systems withdifferent substitution patterns.

The present inventors sought new metallocenes, which provide highactivity, especially in the case of the homopolymerization of propyleneor in the case of copolymerization between propylene and ethylene. Thedesired catalysts should also have improved performance in theproduction of high melting temperature and high molecular weightpolypropylene homopolymers. The desired catalysts should also haveimproved performance in the production of propylene-ethylene copolymers,for instance having high activity for high Mw copolymer products. Thedesired catalysts should also provide propylene-ethylene copolymershaving desirable melting points. Various prior art references aim forone or more of these features.

C₂-symmetric metallocenes are disclosed for example in WO2007/116034.This document reports the synthesis and characterisation of, inter alia,the metallocene rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-5-OMe-6-tBuInd)₂ZrCl₂ and the use ofit as a polymerisation catalyst after activation with MAO for thehomopolymerisation of propylene and copolymerisation of propylene withethylene and higher alpha-olefins in solution polymerisation.

WO02/02576 describes, inter alia,rac-Me2Si[2-Me-4-(3,5-tBu2Ph)Ind]₂ZrCl₂ andrac-Me2Si[2-Me-4-(3,5-tBu2Ph)Ind]2ZrCl₂ (see also WO2014/096171) and itsuse in the manufacture of high Mw and high melting point polypropylene.

WO06/097497 describes, inter alia,rac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl)₂ZrCl₂ supportedon silica and its use in the homo-and copolymerisation of propylene withethylene.

WO2011/076780 describes the use ofrac-Me2Si(2-Me-4-Ph-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl)₂ZrCl₂ activatedwith methylalumoxane in solid particulated form without an externalcarrier, for propylene homopolymerisation

US 6,057,408 describes the influence of the 4-aryl substituent on themolecular weight of ethylene-propylene copolymers produced in liquidslurry.

Asymmetrical metallocenes able to produce isotactic polypropylene havebeen described in the literature. WO2013/007650, describes certainasymmetrical catalysts comprising alkoxy groups at the 5-position of oneof the rings such as dimethylsilylene6-tert-butyl-5-methoxy-2-methyl-4-phenyl-1H-inden-1-yl)-0⁵-6-tert-butyl-2-methyl-4-phenyl-1H-inden-1-yOzirconiumdichloride. Despite its good performance, catalysts based on thisreference are limited in terms of polypropylene homopolymer meltingtemperature, productivity at low MFR. In addition, the overallproductivity of the catalyst still needs to be improved.

WO2015/158790 discloses, inter alia, the complex “2-Zr”[dimethylsilanediyl[η⁵-6-tert-butyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-2-methylinden-1-yl]-[η⁵-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconium dichloride] and describes the use of this complex in theformation of ethylene/1-octene copolymers in a solution process. Adirect comparison is made between a catalyst system of this metallocene,MAO and Trityl tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate, against equivalentsystems in which the metallocene is also CI and has two indenyl ligands“1-Zr”[anti-dimethylsilylene(2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indenyl)(2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butyl-phenyl)indenyl)zirconiumdichloride] or is C₂ and has two indacenyl ligands “3-Zr”[dimethylsilylenebis-(2-i-butyl-4-(4′-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl)zirconiumdichloride]. The catalyst system containing 2-Zr is found to be inferiorin terms of 1-octene incorporation to those containing 1-Zr and 3-Zr.

The catalysts of the invention should ideally be suited for use insolution or in conventional solid supported form, e.g. using silica oralumina supports, or can be used in solid form, however, being free ofexternal support or carrier.

The present applicant has previously developed an alternative toconventional inorganic supports. In WO03/051934, the inventors proposedan alternative form of catalyst which is provided in solid form but doesnot require a conventional external carrier material such as silica. Theinvention is based on the finding that a homogeneous catalyst systemcontaining an organometallic compound of a transition metal can beconverted, in a controlled way, to solid, uniform catalyst particles byfirst forming a liquid/liquid emulsion system, which comprises as thedispersed phase, said solution of the homogeneous catalyst system, andas the continuous phase a solvent immiscible therewith, and thensolidifying said dispersed droplets to form solid particles comprisingthe said catalyst.

The invention described in WO03/051934 enabled the formation of solidspherical catalyst particles of said organo transition metal catalystwithout using e.g. external porous carrier particles, such as silica,normally required in the art. Thus, problems relating to catalyst silicaresidues can be solved by this type of catalyst. Further, it could beseen that catalyst particles having improved morphology, will give, dueto the replica effect, polymer particles having improved morphology aswell. Catalysts of this invention should be able to utilise this method.

The inventors have developed new metallocene catalysts having improvedpolymerisation behaviour, higher catalyst productivity, improvedperformance in the production of high molecular weight polypropylenehomopolymers, and reduced chain transfer to ethylene, enabling theproduction of propylene-ethylene copolymers. During copolymermanufacture, the reduced chain transfer to ethylene, enables theproduction of propylene-ethylene copolymers having higher molecularweights than are currently achievable using alternative C₁ metallocenes.

A number of known metallocenes are set out in the table below:

CE3 CE2 rac- rac-anti- dimethylsilanediylbis dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert- (2-methyl-4-(4′- butylphenyl)indenyl]tert-butylphenyl) zirconium dichloride inden-1-yl)(2- methyl-4-phenyl-5-methoxy-6-tert- butyl inden-1-yl) zirconium dichloride WO98/040331WO2013/007650

CE1 CE4 rac-anti- rac-anti- dimethylsilanediyl dimethylsilanediyl(2-methyl-4-(4-tert- [2-methyl-4-(3′,5′- butylphenyl) inden- di-tert-1-yl)(2-methyl-4- butylphenyl)- (4′-tert- 1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-butylphenyl)-5- s-indacen-1-yl][2- methoxy-6-tert- methyl-4-(3′,5′-di-butyl inden-1-yl) tert-butylphenyl)-5- zirconium methoxy-6-tert-dichloride butylinden-1- yl]zirconium dichloride WO2013/007650WO2015/158790

The metallocene structures above exhibit moderate activity, and providehigh melting polypropylene, or high molecular weight C2/C3 copolymers.However, it would be desirable to provide catalysts which have evenhigher activity, and which provide higher molecular weight polypropyleneand high molecular weight C2/C3 polymers. The present invention solvesthis problem.

The inventors have now found that further modification of theC₁-symmetric metallocene ligand structure provides improved performancein both C3 homopolymerisation and C3/C2 random copolymerisation.

In particular, the catalysts of the invention enable

very high activity in propylene homopolymerisation and propyleneethylene copolymerisation;

improved performance in production of high molecular weight propylenehomopolymers;

improved comonomer incorporation in propylene copolymers;

high activity for high Mw polymer products;

desirable melting points.

Moreover, most metallocenes whose structure has been optimized toproduce high molecular weight isotactic PP, show molecular weightlimitations when used to produce ethylene-propylene copolymers in thegas phase. It is known that tensile and impact properties of aheterophasic PP/EPR, for a given rubber comonomer composition, can beimproved by increasing the molecular weight of the rubber phase (asdescribed for example in J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, vol. 85, pp.2412-2418 and in J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, vol. 87, pp. 1702-1712). Inaddition, conventional metallocene catalysts produce a homopolymermatrix (hPP) with narrow Mw/Mn (usually below 3.0). It is known that abroad molecular weight distribution (Mw/Mn as measured by GPC) of thehPP matrix is beneficial for processability and stiffness (as describedfor example in J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, vol. 61, pp. 649-657).

We have additionally found that the metallocene complexes of theinvention, thanks to the combination of indenyl ligands having differentsubstitution patterns, can produce ethylene propylene rubber in the gasphase having higher molecular weight compared to metallocenes of theprior art. They can also increase the Mw/Mn of the hPP component withina heterophasic PP/EPR blend. Especially, when producing a reactor blendin three steps (three reactors), the Mw/Mn of the homopolymer matrix canbe made relatively broad.

Heterophasic PP/EPR blends can be made with rubber contents above 50 wt%, having good bulk densities and which are free-flowing also at thehighest rubber contents.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

Viewed from one aspect the invention provides a complex of formula (I):

M is Hf or Zr;

each X is a sigma ligand;

L is a bridge of formula -(ER⁸ ₂)_(y)—;

y is 1 or 2;

E is C or Si;

each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alky)silyl,C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl or L is an alkylenegroup such as methylene or ethylene;

Ar and Ar′ are each independently an aryl or heteroaryl group optionallysubstituted by 1 to 3 groups R¹ or R^(1′) respectively;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl group or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there arefour or more R¹ and groups present in total, one or more of R¹ and R¹′is other than tert butyl;

R² and R^(2′) are the same or are different and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, withR⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkylgroup, C₆₋₁₀ aryl group;

each R³ is a —CH—, —CHRx— or C(Rx)₂- group wherein Rx is C₁₋₄ alkyl andwhere m is 2-6;

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group;

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup; and

R⁷ and R^(7′) are the same or are different and are H or a linear orbranched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a complex of formula(Ia)

M is Hf or Zr;

each X is a sigma ligand;

L is a bridge of formula -(ER⁸ ₂)_(y)—;

y is 1 or 2;

E is C or Si;

each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alky)silyl,C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl or L is an alkylenegroup such as methylene or ethylene;

each n is independently 0, 1, 2 or 3;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl group or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there arefour or more R¹ and R″ groups present in total, one or more of R¹ andR^(1′) is other than tert butyl;

R² and R^(2′) are the same or are different and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, withR⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkylgroup, C₆₋₁₀ aryl group;

each R³ is a —CH₂—, —CHRx— or C(Rx)₂— wherein Rx is C₁₋₄ alkyl and wherem is 2-6;

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group;

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup; and

R⁷ and R^(7′) are the same or are different and are H or a linear orbranched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.

In a preferred embodiment of formula (Ia), L isof formula —SiR⁸ ₂—,wherein each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl,C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a complex of formula(Ib):

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

each X is a sigma ligand;

L is an alkylene bridge (e.g. methylene or ethylene) or a bridge of theformula—SiR⁸2-, wherein each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl,tri(C₁-C₂₀-alkyOsilyl, C₆ ⁻ C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl orC₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl;

each n is independently 0, 1, 2 or 3;

R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are alinear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylarylgroup or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there are four ormore R¹ and groups present in total, one or more of R¹ and R¹′ is otherthan tert butyl;

R² and R²′ are the same or are different and are a CH2-R⁹ group, with R⁹being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl group,C₆₋₁₀ aryl group;

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group;

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup; and

R⁷ and R^(7′) are the same or are different and are H or a linear orbranched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a catalyst comprising

(i) a complex of formula (I) as hereinbefore defined and

(ii) a cocatalyst comprising a compound of a group 13 metal,

The catalyst of the invention can be used in non-supported form or insolid form. The catalyst of the invention may be used as a homogeneouscatalyst or heterogeneous catalyst.

The catalyst of the invention in solid form, preferably in solidparticulate form, can be either supported on an external carriermaterial, like silica or alumina, or, in a particularly preferredembodiment, is free from an external carrier, however still being insolid form. For example, the solid catalyst isobtainable by a process inwhich

(a) a liquid/liquid emulsion system is formed, said liquid/liquidemulsion system comprising a solution of the catalyst components (i) and(ii) dispersed in a solvent so as to form dispersed droplets; and

(b) solid particles are formed by solidifying said dispersed droplets.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a process for themanufacture of a catalyst as hereinbefore defined comprising obtaining acomplex of formula (I) and a cocatalyst as hereinbefore described;

forming a liquid/liquid emulsion system, which comprises a solution ofcatalyst components (i) and (ii) dispersed in a solvent, and solidifyingsaid dispersed droplets to form solid particles.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides the use in propylenepolymerisation of a catalyst as hereinbefore defined, especially for theformation of a polypropylene homopolymer or propylene copolymer, e.g.with ethylene or a C4-10 alpha olefin such as 1-hexene.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a process for thepolymerisation propylene comprising reacting propylene and optionalcomonomers with a catalyst as hereinbefore described, especially for theformation polypropylene homopolymer or propylene copolymer, e.g. withethylene.

Definitions

Throughout the description the following definitions are employed.

By “free from an external carrier” is meant that the catalyst does notcontain an external support, such as an inorganic support, for example,silica or alumina, or an organic polymeric support material.

The term “C₁₋₂₀ hydrocarbyl group” includes C₁₋₂₀ alkyl, C₂₋₂₀ alkenyl,C₂₋₂₀ alkynyl, C₃₋₂₀ cycloalkyl, C₃₋₂₀ cycloalkenyl, C₆₋₂₀ aryl groups,C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl groups or C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl groups or of course mixturesof these groups such as cycloalkyl substituted by alkyl. Linear andbranched hydrocarbyl groups cannot contain cyclic units. Aliphatichydrocarbyl groups cannot contain aryl rings.

Unless otherwise stated, preferred C₁₋₂₀ hydrocarbyl groups are C₁₋₂₀alkyl, C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl, C₅₋₂₀ cycloalkyl-alkyl groups, C₇₋₂₀ alkylarylgroups, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl groups or C₆₋₂₀ aryl groups, especially C₁₋₁₀alkyl groups, C₆₋₁₀ aryl groups, or C₇₋₁₂ arylalkyl groups, e.g. C₁₋₈alkyl groups. Most especially preferred hydrocarbyl groups are methyl,ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, tert-butyl, isobutyl, C₅₋₆-cycloalkyl,cyclohexylmethyl, phenyl or benzyl.

The term “halo” includes fluoro, chloro, bromo and iodo groups,especially chloro or fluoro groups, when relating to the complexdefinition.

The oxidation state of the metal ion is governed primarily by the natureof the metal ion in question and the stability of the individualoxidation states of each metal ion.

It will be appreciated that in the complexes of the invention, the metalion M is coordinated by ligands X so as to satisfy the valency of themetal ion and to fill its available coordination sites. The nature ofthese σ-ligands can vary greatly.

The terms “C4 phenyl ring” and “C4′ phenyl ring” relate to thesubstituted phenyl rings attached to the 4 and 4′ positions of theindenyl and indacenyl rings, respectively. The numbering of these ringswill be evident from the structures indicated herein.

Catalyst activity is defined in this application to be the amount ofpolymer produced/g catalyst/h. Catalyst metal activity is defined hereto be the amount of polymer produced/g Metal/h. The term productivity isalso sometimes used to indicate the catalyst activity although herein itdesignates the amount of polymer produced per unit weight of catalyst.

The term “molecular weight” is used herein to refer to weight averagemolecular weight Mw unless otherwise stated.

There can be up to 6 R¹ and R^(1′) groups combined in the complex offormula (I). It is required that if there are four or more R¹ and R^(1′)groups, at least one is not tert butyl. There may be 0, 1, 2 or 3 tertbutyl groups on the complex but no more.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

This invention relates to a series of new ligands, complexes and hencecatalysts that are ideal for the polymerisation of propylene. Thecomplexes of the invention are asymmetrical. Asymmetrical means simplythat the two ligands forming the metallocene are different, that is,each ligand bears a set of substituents that are chemically different.

The complexes of the invention are preferably chiral, racemic bridgedbisindenyl C₁-symmetric metallocenes. Although the complexes of theinvention are formally C₁-symmetric, the complexes ideally retain apseudo-C₂-symmetry since they maintain C₂-symmetry in close proximity ofthe metal center although not at the ligand periphery. By nature oftheir chemistry both anti and syn enantiomer pairs (in case ofC₁-symmetric complexes) are formed during the synthesisof the complexes.For the purpose of this invention, racemic-anti means that the twoindenyl ligands are oriented in opposite directions with respect to thecyclopentadienyl-metal-cyclopentadienyl plane, while racemic-syn meansthat the two indenyl ligands are oriented in the same direction withrespect to the cyclopentadienyl-metal-cyclopentadienyl plane, as shownin the scheme below.

Formula (I), and any sub formulae, are intended to cover both syn- andanti-configurations. Preferred complexes are in the anti configuration.

It is preferred if the metallocenes of the invention are employed as theracemic or racemic-anti isomers. Ideally therefore at least 95% mol,such as at least 98% mol, especially at least 99% mol of the metalloceneis in the racemic or racemic-anti isomeric form.

In the catalysts of the invention the following preferences apply.Catalysts according to the invention are of formula (I):

In a complex of formula (I) it is preferred if M is Zr or Hf, preferablyZr;

Each X is a sigma ligand. Most preferably each X is independently ahydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group or an R group, where Ris a C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group. Most preferably X is chlorine,benzyl or a methyl group. Preferably both X groups are the same. Themost preferred options are two chlorides, two methyl or two benzylgroups, especially two chlorides.

L is -(ER⁸2)_(y)—. It is preferred if E is Si. It is preferred if yis 1. -(ER⁸2)_(y)— is preferably a methylene or ethylene linker or L isa bridge of the formula —SiR⁸2—, wherein each R⁸ is independently aC₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl.The term C₁₋₂₀ hydrocarbyl group therefore includes C₁₋₂₀ alkyl,C₂₋₂₀alkenyl, C₂₋₂₀alkynyl, C₃₋₂₀ cycloalkyl, C₃₋₂₀ cycloalkenyl, C₆₋₂₀aryl groups, C₇₋₂₀alkylaryl groups or C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl groups or ofcourse mixtures of these groups such as cycloalkyl substituted by alkyl.Unless otherwise stated, preferred C₁₋₂₀ hydrocarbyl groups are C₁₋₂₀alkyl, C₄₋₂₀ cycloalkyl, C₅₋₂₀ cycloalkyl-alkyl groups, C₇₋₂₀ alkylarylgroups, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl groups or C₆₋₂₀ aryl groups. If L is an alkylenelinker group, ethylene and methylene are preferred.

Preferably both R⁸ groups are the same. It is preferred if R⁸ is aC₁-C₁₀-hydrocarbyl or C₆-C₁₀-aryl group, such as methyl, ethyl, propyl,isopropyl, tertbutyl, isobutyl, C₅₋₆-cycloalkyl, cyclohexylmethyl,phenyl or benzyl, more preferably both R⁸ are a C₁-C₆-alkyl,C₃₋₈cycloalkyl or C₆-aryl group, such as a C₁-C₄-alkyl, C5-6 cycloalkylor C₆-aryl group and most preferably both R⁸ are methyl or one is methyland another cyclohexyl. Alkylene linkers are preferably methylene orethylene. L is most preferably —Si(CH₃)₂—.

Ar and Ar′ are preferably phenyl rings.

Each substituent R¹ and R^(1′) are independently the same or different,and are preferably a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group or C₆₋₂₀ arylgroups, more preferably a linear or branched C₁-C₄ alkyl group.Preferably each R¹ and each R^(1′) are independently methyl, ethyl,isopropyl or —CMe₃, especially methyl or —CMe₃. Preferably each R¹ isthe same and each R^(1′) is the same.

Each n is independently 0, 1, 2 or 3, preferably 1 or 2. The total ofthe two “n” values is ideally 2, 3 or 4. When n is 1 the ring ispreferably substituted with the group R¹ or R^(1′) at the para position(4 or 4′ position). When n is 2 the ring is preferably substituted withthe groups R¹ or R^(1′) at the ortho positions (3 and 5, or 3′ and 5′positions).

In all embodiments of the invention the substitution of the C(4) andC(4′) phenyl groups are subject to the proviso that the complex issubstituted in total with 0, 1, 2 or 3 CMe₃ groups across the C(4) andC(4′) phenyl rings combined, preferably 0, 1 or 2 CMe₃ groups across theC(4) and C(4′) phenyl rings combined. Alternatively stated, if the two nvalues sum to 4 or more, at least one R¹ or group present cannotrepresent tert butyl.

Ideally, no C(4) or C(4′) ring will comprise two branched substituents.If a C(4) or C(4′) ring contains two substituents (i.e. n is 2) then itis preferred if R¹ or R^(1′) is C1-4 linear alkyl, e.g. methyl.

If a C(4) or C(4′) ring contains one substituent (i.e. n is 1) then itis preferred that R¹ or R^(1′) is a branched C4-6 alkyl, e.g. tertbutyl.

In a particular embodiment, Ar and Ar′ in formula I (or any formulabelow) are independently selected from phenyl rings substituted in the3,5- or 4-positions with a linear or branched C₁-C₄ alkyl group; i.e.corresponding to 3,5 or 4-position substitutions with R¹ and R_(1′)being a C₁-C₄ alkyl group and n being 1 or 2. In a particularembodiment, Ar and Ar′ in formula I are independently selected from3,5-dimethyl phenyl, 3,5-ditertbutyl and 4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl.Therefore, in a particular embodiment, in the complex of formula I, bothAr and Ar′ are 3,5-dimethyl phenyl, both Ar and Ar′ are4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl, or one of Ar and Ar′ is 3,5-dimethyl phenyl andthe other is 4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl. Other preferred options include oneof Ar or Ar′ being 3,5-ditertbutylphenyl with the other being3,5-dimethylphenyl or 4-tertbutylphenyl. These particular embodimentsmay be applied to all of the structures II-VIII described herein, wheretechnically viable. In other words, in a particular embodiment, R¹,R^(1′) and each independent value of n are selected such that the C(4)or C(4′) phenyl rings are 3,5-dimethyl phenyl, 3,5-ditertbutylphenyland/or 4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl.

In an embodiment at least one of the C(4) or C(4′) phenyl rings is3,5-dimethyl phenyl.

In an embodiment at least one of the C(4) or C(4′) phenyl rings is4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl.

R² and R^(2′) are each the same or different, and are a CH₂-R⁹ group,with R⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, like methyl,ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, n-butyl, butyl, sec.-butyl and tert.-butyl orC₃₋₈cycloalkyl (e.g. cyclohexyl) or C₆₋₁₀ aryl (pref phenyl). PreferablyR² and R^(2′) are the same and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H orlinear or branched C₁-C₄-alkyl group, more preferably R² and R^(2′) arethe same and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H or linear or branchedC₁-C₃-alkyl group. Most preferably R² and R^(2′) are both methyl.

R³ is preferbly —CH2—. The subscript m is preferably 2 to 4, such as 3(thus forming a 5 membered ring).

R⁵ is a preferably linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group or C₆₋₂₀ arylgroup, such as methyl, ethyl, n-propyl, i-propyl, n-butyl, i-butyl,sec.-butyl and tert.-butyl, preferably a linear C₁-C₄-alkyl group, morepreferably a C₁-C₂-alkyl group and most preferably methyl.

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with each R¹⁰ being the same or different andbeing a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group. Preferably each R¹⁰ arethe same or different with R^(th) being a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkylgroup, more preferably with R¹⁰ being the same and being a C₁-C₂-alkylgroup. Most preferably R⁶ is a tert.-butyl group and hence all R¹⁰groups are methyl.

R⁷ and R^(7′) are each the same or different, and are H or a linear orbranched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, preferably H or a linear or branchedC₁-C₄-alkyl group, and more preferably H or a C₁-C₂-alkyl group. In someembodiments one of R⁷ or R^(7′) is H and the other is a linear orbranched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, preferably a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkylgroup and more preferably a C₁-C₂-alkyl group. It is especiallypreferred that R⁷ and R^(7′) are the same. It is most preferred thatboth R⁷ and R^(7′) are H.

In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex of formula(II)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

X is a sigma ligand, preferably each X is independently a hydrogen atom,a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group;

L is an alkylene bridge or a bridge of the formula —SiR⁸ ₂—, whereineach R⁸ is independently C₁-C₆-alkyl, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl or C₆-aryl group;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group with the proviso that ifthere are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneouslybe tert butyl;

R² and R^(2′) are the same or are different and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, withR⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group;

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup.

In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex offormula (III)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

each X is a sigma ligand, preferably each X is independently a hydrogenatom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzylgroup;

L is —SiR⁸ ₂—, wherein each R⁸ is C₁₋₆ alkyl or C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso thatif there are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannotsimultaneously be tert butyl;

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup.

In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex offormula (IV)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

each X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group;

L is —SiR⁸ ₂—, wherein each R⁸ is C₁₋₄ alkyl or C₅₋₆ cycloalkyl;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group with the proviso that ifthere are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneouslybe tert butyl,

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkylgroup.

In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex offormula (V)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl,phenyl or benzyl group;

L is —SiMe₂;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso thatif there are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannotsimultaneously be tert butyl,

R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkyl group; and

R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₄ alkylgroup.

In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex offormula (VI)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl,phenyl or benzyl group;

L is —SiMe₂;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso thatif there are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannotsimultaneously be tert butyl;

R⁵ is a linear C₁-C₄-alkyl group such as methyl; and

R⁶ is tert butyl.

In a further preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex offormula (VII)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl,phenyl or benzyl group, especially chlorine;

L is —SiMe₂;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different andare a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkyl group with the proviso that ifthere are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneouslybe tert butyl;

R⁵ is methyl; and

R⁶ is tert butyl.

In a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a complex of formula(VIII)

wherein

M is Hf or Zr;

X is Cl;

L is —SiMe₂;

each n is independently 1 or 2;

R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently methyl or tert butyl with theproviso that if there are four R¹ and R^(1′) groups present, all 4cannot simultaneously be tert butyl,

R⁵ is methyl; and

R⁶ is tert butyl.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred if the 4-positionsubstituent on either indenyl or indacenyl ring is a 3,5-dimethylphenyl-or 4-tBu-phenyl group.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred if the 4-positionsubstituent on one of the indenyl or indacenyl ring is a 3,5-ditertbutyland the other indenyl or indacenyl ring carries a 4-position3,5-dimethylphenyl- or 4-tBu-phenyl group. In such a structure it ispreferred if the ditertbutylphenyl is present on the indenyl ring.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred that if n=2 then both R¹groups are the same.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred that if n=2 then bothR^(1′) groups are the same.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred that if n=2 then R¹groups are on the 3,5-position. In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it ispreferred that if n=2 then R^(1′) groups are on the 3,5-position.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred that if n=1 then R¹ isonthe 4-position.

In any of formula (I) to (VIII) it is preferred that if n=1 then R^(1′)ison the 4-position.

Particular complexes of the invention include:

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-iso-butyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy -6-tert-butylindenyl zirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-neo-pentyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy -6-tert-butylindenyl zirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-benzyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-cyclohexylmethyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-iso-butyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-neo-pentyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-benzyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-cyclohexylmethyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-cyclohexylmethyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-ditert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-ditert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tertbutylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

Racemic-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tertbutylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindenylzirconium dichloride or dimethyl,

MC-IE1 MC-IE2 MC-IE3 rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl rac-anti-rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl [2-methyl-4-(4′-tert- dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4′-tert- butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7- [2-methyl-4-(3′,5′-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7- tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7- tetrahydro-s-indacen-1- methyl-4-(4′-tert-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1- yl][2-methyl-4-(3′,5′- butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-yl][2-methyl-4-(3′,5′- dimethylphenyl)-5- tert-butylinden-1-yl]dimethylphenyl)-5- methoxy-6-tert-butylinden- zirconium dichloridemethoxy-6-tert- 1-yl] butylinden-1-yl] zirconium dichloride zirconiumdichloride

MC-IE4 MC-IE5 MC-IE6 rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2- rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4′-tert-butyl phenyl)- methyl-4-(3′,5′-dimethylmethyl-4-(3′,5′-di-tert-butyl- 1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-phenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s- phenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-yl][2-methyl-4-(3′,5′-di-tert- indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3′,5′-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4′- butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy- tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-butylinden-1-yl]zirconium 6-tert-butylinden-1-tert-butylinden-1-yl]zirconium dichloride yl]zirconium dichloridedichloride

For the avoidance of doubt, any narrower definition of a substituentoffered above can be combined with any other broad or narroweddefinition of any other substituent.

Throughout the disclosure above, where a narrower definition of asubstituent is presented, that narrower definition is deemed disclosedin conjunction with all broader and narrower definitions of othersubstituents in the application.

Synthesis

The ligands required to form the catalysts of the invention can besynthesised by any process and the skilled organic chemist would be ableto devise various synthetic protocols for the manufacture of thenecessary ligand materials. WO2007/116034 discloses the necessarychemistry and is herein incorporated by reference. Synthetic protocolscan also generally be found in WO2002/02576, WO2011/135004,WO2012/084961, WO2012/001052, WO2011/076780 and WO2015/158790. Theexamples section also provides the skilled person with sufficientdirection.

Intermediates

Whilst the invention primarily relates to complexes and catalyststhereof, the ligands used to form those complexes are also new. Theinvention further relates therefore to ligands of formula (Ib′) fromwhich the MX₂ coordination has been removed and the proton returned tothe indenyl. Ligands of interest are therefore of formula (I′)

preferably (Ib′)

wherein the substituents are as hereinbefore defined and the dottedlines represent a double bond present in between carbons 1 and 2 or 2and 3 of the indenyl ring, and between carbons 1′ and 2′ or 2′ and 3′ ofthe indacenyl ring. It will be appreciated therefore that this moleculecontains double bond isomers. By double bond isomers is meant thecompounds where the double bond is positioned between the 2 and 3 atomsrather than 1 and 2 atoms of the bicyclic ring. It may be that more thanone double bond isomer is present in a sample. Preferred ligands areanalogues of the complexes (II) to (VIII) described above from which MX₂coordination has been removed and the proton returned to the indenyl.

Cocatalyst

To form an active catalytic species it is normally necessary to employ acocatalyst as is well known in the art. Cocatalysts comprising one ormore compounds of Group 13 metals, like organoaluminium compounds orborates used to activate metallocene catalysts are suitable for use inthis invention.

The olefin polymerisation catalyst system of the invention comprises (i)a complex as defined herein; and normally (ii) an aluminium alkylcompound (or other appropriate cocatalyst), or the reaction productthereof Thus the cocatalyst is preferably an alumoxane, like MAO or analumoxane other than MAO.

Borate cocatalysts can also be employed. It will be appreciated by theskilled man that where boron based cocatalysts are employed, it isnormal to preactivate the complex by reaction thereof with an aluminiumalkyl compound, such as TIBA. This procedure is well known and anysuitable aluminium alkyl, e.g. Al(C₁₋₆-alkyl)₃. can be used.

It is also possible to use a mixture of Al based and B basedcocatalysts.

The aluminoxane cocatalyst can be one of formula (X):

where n is usually from 6 to 20 and R has the meaning below.

Aluminoxanes are formed on partial hydrolysisof organoaluminumcompounds, for example those of the formula AlR₃, AlR₂Y and Al₂R₃Y₃where R can be, for example, C1-C10 alkyl, preferably C1-C5 alkyl, orC3-10-cycloalkyl, C7-C12-arylalkyl or alkylaryl and/or phenyl ornaphthyl, and where Y can be hydrogen, halogen, preferably chlorine orbromine, or C1-C10 alkoxy, preferably methoxy or ethoxy. The resultingoxygen-containing aluminoxanes are not in general pure compounds butmixtures of oligomers of the formula (X).

The preferred aluminoxane is methylaluminoxane (MAO). Since thealuminoxanes used according to the invention as cocatalysts are not,owing to their mode of preparation, pure compounds, the molarity ofaluminoxane solutions hereinafter is based on their aluminium content.

It has been surprisingly found however, that in the context ofheterogeneous catalysis, where catalysts are not supported on anyexternal carrier or supported as described above, that in specific caseshigher activities can be achieved if a boron based cocatalyst is alsoemployed as a cocatalyst. It will be appreciated by the skilled man thatwhere boron based cocatalysts are employed, it is normal to preactivatethe complex by reaction thereof with an aluminium alkyl compound, suchas TIBA. This procedure is well known and any suitable aluminium alkyl,preferably an aluminium alkyl compounds of the formula (X) AlR₃ with Rbeing a linear or branched C₂-C₈-alkyl group, can be used.

Preferred aluminium alkyl compounds are triethylaluminium,tri-isobutylaluminium, tri-isohexylaluminium, tri-n-octylaluminium andtri-isooctylaluminium.

Boron based cocatalysts of interest include boron compounds containing aborate 3⁺ ion, i.e. borate compounds. These compounds generally containan anion of formula:

(Z)₄B⁻  (XI)

where Z is an optionally substituted phenyl derivative, said substituentbeing a halo-C₁₋₆-alkyl or halo group. Preferred options are fluoro ortrifluoromethyl. Most preferably, the phenyl group is perfluorinated.Such ionic cocatalysts preferably contain a non-coordinating anion suchas tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate.

Suitable counterions are protonated amine or aniline derivatives orphosphonium ions. These may have the general formula (XII) or (XIII):

NQ₄ ⁺ (XI) or PQ₄ ⁺  (XIII)

where Q is independently H, C₁₋₆-alkyl, C₃₋₈ cycloakyl,phenylC₁₋₆-alkylene- or optionally substituted Ph. Optional substituentsmay be C₁₋₆-alkyl, halo or nitro. There may be one or more than one suchsubstituent. Preferred substituted Ph groups include thereforepara-substituted phenyl, preferably tolyl or dimethylphenyl.

It is preferred if at least one Q group is H, thus preferred compoundsare those of formula:

NHQ₃ ⁺ (VI) or PHQ₃ ⁺  (XIV)

Preferred phenyl-C₁₋₆-alkyl-groups include benzyl.

Suitable counterions therefore include: methylammonium, anilinium,dimethylammonium, diethylammonium, N-methylanilinium, diphenylammonium,N,N-dimethylanilinium, trimethylammonium, triethylammonium,tri-n-butylammonium, methyldiphenylammonium,p-bromo-N,N-dimethylanilinium or p-nitro-N,N-dimethylanilinium,especially dimethylammonium or N,N-dimethylanilinium. The use ofpyridinium as an ion is a further option.

Phosphonium ions of interest include triphenylphosphonium,triethylphosphonium, diphenylphosphonium, tri(methylphenyl)phosphoniumand tri(dimethylphenyl)phosphonium.

A more preferred counterion is trityl (CPh₃ ⁺) or analogues thereof inwhich the Ph group is functionalised to carry one or more alkyl groups.Highly preferred borates of use in the invention therefore comprise thetetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate ion.

Preferred ionic compounds which can be used according to the presentinvention include:

tributylammoniumtetra(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

tributylammoniumtetra(trifluoromethylphenyl)borate,

tributylammoniumtetra-(4-fluorophenyl)b orate,

N,N-dimethylcyclohexylammoniumtetrakis-(pentafluorophenyOborate,

N,N-dimethylbenzylammoniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyOborate,

N,N-dimethylaniliniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

N,N-di(propyl)ammoniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

di(cyclohexyl)ammoniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

triphenylcarbeniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyOborate,

or ferroceniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate.

Preference is given to triphenylcarbeniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

N,N-dimethylcyclohexylammoniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate,

N,N-dimethylbenzylammoniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate or

N,N-dimethylaniliniumtetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate.

It has been surprisingly found that certain boron cocatalysts areespecially preferred. Preferred borates of use in the inventiontherefore comprise the trityl ion. Thus the use ofN,N-dimethylammonium-tetrakispentafluorophenylborate and Ph3CB(PhF5)4and analogues therefore are especially favoured.

In one embodiment, preferably both cocatalysts, an aluminoxane and aboron based cocatalyst, are used in the catalyst system of the presentinvention.

Suitable amounts of cocatalyst will be well known to the skilled man.

The molar ratio of boron to the metal ion of the metallocene may be inthe range 0.5:1 to 10:1 mol/mol, preferably 1:1 to 10:1, especially 1:1to 5:1 mol/mol.

The molar ratio of Al in the aluminoxane to the metal ion of themetallocene may be in the range 1:1 to 2000:1 mol/mol, preferably 10:1to 1000:1, and more preferably 50:1 to 500:1 mol/mol.

Catalyst Manufacture

The metallocene complex of the present invention can be used incombination with a suitable cocatalyst as a catalyst for thepolymerization of propylene, e.g. in a solvent such as toluene or analiphatic hydrocarbon, (i.e. for polymerization in solution), as it iswell known in the art. Preferably, polymerization of propylene takesplace in the condensed phase or in gas phase.

The catalyst of the invention can be used in supported or unsupportedform. The particulate support material used is preferably an organic orinorganic material, such as silica, alumina or zirconia or a mixed oxidesuch as silica-alumina, in particular silica, alumina or silica-alumina.The use of a silica support is preferred. The skilled man is aware ofthe procedures required to support a metallocene catalyst.

Especially preferably the support is a porous material so that thecomplex may be loaded into the pores of the support, e.g. using aprocess analogous to those described in WO94/14856 (Mobil), WO95/12622(Borealis) and WO2006/097497. The particle size is not critical but ispreferably in the range 5 to 200 μm, more preferably 20 to 80 μm. Theuse of these supports is routine in the art.

In an alternative embodiment, no support is used at all. Such a catalystcan be prepared in solution, for example in an aromatic solvent liketoluene, by contacting the metallocene (as a solid or as a solution)with the cocatalyst, for example methylaluminoxane or a borane or aborate salt previously dissolved in an aromatic solvent, or can beprepared by sequentially adding the dissolved catalyst components to thepolymerization medium. In a preferred embodiment, the metallocene (whenX differs from alkyl or hydrogen) is prereacted with an aluminum alkyl,in a ratio metal/aluminum of from 1:1 up to 1:500, preferably from 1:1up to 1:250, and then combined with a solution of the borane or boratecocatalyst dissolved in an aromatic solvent, either in a separate vesselor directly into the polymerization reactor. Preferred metal/boronratios are between 1:1 and 1:100, more preferably 1:1 to 1:10.

In one particularly preferred embodiment, no external carrier is usedbut the catalyst is still presented in solid particulate form. Thus, noexternal support material, such as inert organic or inorganic carrier,for example silica as described above is employed.

In order to provide the catalyst of the invention in solid form butwithout using an external carrier, it is preferred if a liquid/liquidemulsion system is used. The process involves forming dispersingcatalyst components (i) and (ii) in a solvent, and solidifying saiddispersed droplets to form solid particles.

In particular, the method involves preparing a solution of one or morecatalyst components; dispersing said solution in an solvent to form anemulsion in which said one or more catalyst components are present inthe droplets of the dispersed phase; immobilising the catalystcomponents in the dispersed droplets, in the absence of an externalparticulate porous support, to form solid particles comprising the saidcatalyst, and optionally recovering said particles.

This process enables the manufacture of active catalyst particles withimproved morphology, e.g. with a predetermined spherical shape, surfaceproperties and particle size and without using any added external poroussupport material, such as an inorganic oxide, e.g. silica. By the term“preparing a solution of one or more catalyst components” is meant thatthe catalyst forming compounds may be combined in one solution which isdispersed to the immiscible solvent, or, alternatively, at least twoseparate catalyst solutions for each part of the catalyst formingcompounds may be prepared, which are then dispersed successively to thesolvent.

In a preferred method for forming the catalyst at least two separatesolutions for each or part of said catalyst may be prepared, which arethen dispersed successively to the immiscible solvent.

More preferably, a solution of the complex comprising the transitionmetal compound and the cocatalyst is combined with the solvent to forman emulsion wherein that inert solvent forms the continuous liquid phaseand the solution comprising the catalyst components forms the dispersedphase (discontinuous phase) in the form of dispersed droplets. Thedroplets are then solidified to form solid catalyst particles, and thesolid particles are separated from the liquid and optionally washedand/or dried. The solvent forming the continuous phase may be immiscibleto the catalyst solution at least at the conditions (e. g. temperatures)used during the dispersing step.

The term “immiscible with the catalyst solution” means that the solvent(continuous phase) is fully immiscible or partly immiscible i.e. notfully miscible with the dispersed phase solution.

Preferably said solvent is inert in relation to the compounds of thecatalyst system to be produced. Full disclosure of the necessary processcan be found in WO03/051934 which is herein incorporated by reference.

The inert solvent must be chemically inert at least at the conditions(e.g. temperature) used during the dispersing step. Preferably, thesolvent of said continuous phase does not contain dissolved therein anysignificant amounts of catalyst forming compounds. Thus, the solidparticles of the catalyst are formed in the droplets from the compoundswhich originate from the dispersed phase (i.e. are provided to theemulsion in a solution dispersed into the continuous phase).

The terms “immobilisation” and “solidification” are used hereininterchangeably for the same purpose, i.e. for forming free flowingsolid catalyst particles in the absence of an external porousparticulate carrier, such as silica. The solidification happens thuswithin the droplets. Said step can be effected in various ways asdisclosed in said WO03/051934 Preferably solidification is caused by anexternal stimulus to the emulsion system such as a temperature change tocause the solidification. Thus in said step the catalyst component (s)remain “fixed” within the formed solid particles. It is also possiblethat one or more of the catalyst components may take part in thesolidification/immobilisation reaction.

Accordingly, solid, compositionally uniform particles having apredetermined particle size range can be obtained.

Furthermore, the particle size of the catalyst particles of theinvention can be controlled by the size of the droplets in the solution,and spherical particles with a uniform particle size distribution can beobtained.

The invention is also industrially advantageous, since it enables thepreparation of the solid particles to be carried out as a one-potprocedure. Continuous or semicontinuous processes are also possible forproducing the catalyst.

Dispersed Phase

The principles for preparing two phase emulsion systems are known in thechemical field. Thus, in order to form the two phase liquid system, thesolution of the catalyst component (s) and the solvent used as thecontinuous liquid phase have to be essentially immiscible at leastduring the dispersing step. This can be achieved in a known manner e.g.by choosing said two liquids and/or the temperature of the dispersingstep/solidifying step accordingly.

A solvent may be employed to form the solution of the catalyst component(s). Said solvent is chosen so that it dissolves said catalyst component(s). The solvent can be preferably an organic solvent such as used inthe field, comprising an optionally substituted hydrocarbon such aslinear or branched aliphatic, alicyclic or aromatic hydrocarbon, such asa linear or cyclic alkane, an aromatic hydrocarbon and/or a halogencontaining hydrocarbon.

Examples of aromatic hydrocarbons are toluene, benzene, ethylbenzene,propylbenzene, butylbenzene and xylene. Toluene is a preferred solvent.The solution may comprise one or more solvents. Such a solvent can thusbe used to facilitate the emulsion formation, and usually does not formpart of the solidified particles, but e.g. is removed afterthesolidification step together with the continuous phase.

Alternatively, a solvent may take part in the solidification, e.g. aninert hydrocarbon having a high melting point (waxes), such as above 40°C., suitably above 70° C., e. g. above 80° C. or 90° C., may be used assolvents of the dispersed phase to immobilise the catalyst compoundswithin the formed droplets.

In another embodiment, the solvent consists partly or completely of aliquid monomer, e.g. liquid olefin monomer designed to be polymerised ina “prepolymerisation” immobilisation step.

Continuous Phase

The solvent used to form the continuous liquid phase is a single solventor a mixture of different solvents and may be immiscible with thesolution of the catalyst components at least at the conditions (e.g.temperatures) used during the dispersing step. Preferably said solventis inert in relation to said compounds.

The term “inert in relation to said compounds” means herein that thesolvent of the continuous phase is chemically inert, i.e. undergoes nochemical reaction with any catalyst forming component. Thus, the solidparticles of the catalyst are formed in the droplets from the compoundswhich originate from the dispersed phase, i.e. are provided to theemulsion in a solution dispersed into the continuous phase.

It is preferred that the catalyst components used for forming the solidcatalyst will not be soluble in the solvent of the continuous liquidphase. Preferably, said catalyst components are essentially insoluble insaid continuous phase forming solvent.

Solidification takes place essentially afterthe droplets are formed,i.e. the solidification is effected within the droplets e.g. by causinga solidifying reaction among the compounds present in the droplets.Furthermore, even if some solidifying agent is added to the systemseparately, it reacts within the droplet phase and no catalyst formingcomponents go into the continuous phase.

The term “emulsion” used herein covers both bi-and multiphasic systems.

In a preferred embodiment said solvent forming the continuous phase isan inert solvent including a halogenated organic solvent or mixturesthereof, preferably fluorinated organic solvents and particularly semi,highly or perfluorinated organic solvents and functionalised derivativesthereof. Examples of the above-mentioned solvents are semi, highly orperfluorinated hydrocarbons, such as alkanes, alkenes and cycloalkanes,ethers, e.g. perfluorinated ethers and amines, particularly tertiaryamines, and functionalised derivatives thereof. Preferred are semi,highly or perfluorinated, particularly perfluorinated hydrocarbons, e.g.perfluorohydrocarbons of e.g. C3-C30, such as C4-C10. Specific examplesof suitable perfluoroalkanes and perfluorocycloalkanes includeperfluoro-hexane, -heptane, -octane and -(methylcyclohexane). Semifluorinated hydrocarbons relates particularly to semifluorinatedn-alkanes, such as perfluoroalkyl-alkane.

“Semi fluorinated” hydrocarbons also include such hydrocarbons whereinblocks of —C—F and —C—H alternate. “Highly fluorinated” means that themajority of the —C—H units are replaced with —C—F units.“Perfluorinated” means that all —C—H units are replaced with —C—F units.See the articles of A. Enders and G. Maas in “Chemie in unserer Zeit”,34. Jahrg. 2000, Nr.6, and of Pierandrea Lo Nostro in “Advances inColloid and Interface Science”, 56 (1995) 245-287, Elsevier Science.

Dispersing Step

The emulsion can be formed by any means known in the art: by mixing,such as by stirring said solution vigorously to said solvent forming thecontinuous phase or by means of mixing mills, or by means of ultra sonicwave, or by using a so called phase change method for preparing theemulsion by first forming a homogeneous system which is then transferredby changing the temperature of the system to a biphasic system so thatdroplets will be formed.

The two phase state is maintained during the emulsion formation step andthe solidification step, as, for example, by appropriate stirring.

Additionally, emulsifying agents/emulsion stabilisers can be used,preferably in a manner known in the art, for facilitating the formationand/or stability of the emulsion. For the said purposes e.g.surfactants, e.g. a class based on hydrocarbons (including polymerichydrocarbons with a molecular weight e.g. up to 10 000 and optionallyinterrupted with a heteroatom(s)), preferably halogenated hydrocarbons,such as semi- or highly fluorinated hydrocarbons optionally having afunctional group selected e.g. from —OH, —SH, NH₂, NR″₂. —COOH, —COONH2,oxides of alkenes, —CR″═CH₂, where R″ is hydrogen, or C1-C20 alkyl,C₂₋₂₀-alkenyl or C₂₋₂₀-alkynyl group, oxo-groups, cyclic ethers and/orany reactive derivative of these groups, like alkoxy, or carboxylic acidalkyl ester groups, or, preferably semi-, highly- or perfluorinatedhydrocarbons having a functionalised terminal, can be used. Thesurfactants can be added to the catalyst solution, which forms thedispersed phase of the emulsion, to facilitate the forming of theemulsion and to stabilize the emulsion.

Alternatively, an emulsifying and/or emulsion stabilising aid can alsobe formed by reacting a surfactant precursor bearing at least onefunctional group with a compound reactive with said functional group andpresent in the catalyst solution or in the solvent forming thecontinuous phase. The obtained reaction product acts as the actualemulsifying aid and or stabiliser in the formed emulsion system.

Examples of the surfactant precursors usable for forming said reactionproduct include e.g. known surfactants which bear at least onefunctional group selected e.g. from —OH, —SH, NH₂, NR″₂. —COOH, —COONH₂,oxides of alkenes, —CR″═CH₂, where R″ is hydrogen, or C₁-C₂₀ alkyl,C₂₋₂₀-alkenyl or C₂₋₂₀-alkynyl group, oxo-groups, cyclic ethers with 3to 5 ring atoms, and/or any reactive derivative of these groups, likealkoxy or carboxylic acid alkyl ester groups; e.g. semi-, highly orperfluorinated hydrocarbons bearing one or more of said functionalgroups. Preferably, the surfactant precursor has a terminalfunctionality as defined above.

The compound reacting with such surfactant precursor is preferablycontained in the catalyst solution and may be a further additive or oneor more of the catalyst forming compounds. Such compound is e.g. acompound of group 13 (e.g. MAO and/or an aluminium alkyl compound and/ora transition metal compound).

If a surfactant precursor is used, it is preferably first reacted with acompound of the catalyst solution before the addition of the transitionmetal compound. In one embodiment e.g. a highly fluorinated C1-n(suitably C4-30-or C5-15) alcohol (e.g. highly fluorinated heptanol,octanol or nonanol), oxide (e.g. propenoxide) or acrylate ester isreacted with a cocatalyst to form the “actual” surfactant. Then, anadditional amount of cocatalyst and the transition metal compound isadded to said solution and the obtained solution is dispersed to thesolvent forming the continuous phase. The “actual” surfactant solutionmay be prepared before the dispersing step or in the dispersed system.If said solution is made before the dispersing step, then the prepared“actual” surfactant solution and the transition metal solution may bedispersed successively (e. g. the surfactant solution first) to theimmiscible solvent, or be combined together before the dispersing step.

Solidification

The solidification of the catalyst component(s) in the disperseddroplets can be effected in various ways, e.g. by causing oraccelerating the formation of said solid catalyst forming reactionproducts of the compounds present in the droplets. This can be effected,depending on the used compounds and/or the desired solidification rate,with or without an external stimulus, such as a temperature change ofthe system.

In a particularly preferred embodiment, the solidification is effectedafterthe emulsion system is formed by subjecting the system to anexternal stimulus, such as a temperature change. Temperature differencesof e.g. 5 to 100° C., such as 10 to 100° C., or 20to 90° C., such as 50to 90° C.

The emulsion system may be subjected to a rapid temperature change tocause a fast solidification in the dispersed system. The dispersed phasemay e. g. be subjected to an immediate (within milliseconds to fewseconds) temperature change in order to achieve an instantsolidification of the component (s) within the droplets. The appropriatetemperature change, i. e. an increase or a decrease in the temperatureof an emulsion system, required for the desired solidification rate ofthe components cannot be limited to any specific range, but naturallydepends on the emulsion system, i. a. on the used compounds and theconcentrations/ratios thereof, as well as on the used solvents, and ischosen accordingly. It is also evident that any techniques may be usedto provide sufficient heating or cooling effect to the dispersed systemto cause the desired solidification.

In one embodiment the heating or cooling effect isobtained by bringingthe emulsion system with a certain temperature to an inert receivingmedium with significantly different temperature, e. g. as stated above,whereby said temperature change of the emulsion system is sufficient tocause the rapid solidification of the droplets. The receiving medium canbe gaseous, e. g. air, or a liquid, preferably a solvent, or a mixtureof two or more solvents, wherein the catalyst component (s) is (are)immiscible and which is inert in relation to the catalyst component (s).For instance, the receiving medium comprises the same immiscible solventused as the continuous phase in the first emulsion formation step.

Said solvents can be used alone or as a mixture with other solvents,such as aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbons, such as alkanes. Preferablya fluorinated solvent as the receiving medium is used, which may be thesame as the continuous phase in the emulsion formation, e. g.perfluorinated hydrocarbon.

Alternatively, the temperature difference may be effected by gradualheating of the emulsion system, e. g. up to 10° C. per minute,preferably 0.5 to 6° C. per minute and more preferably in 1 to 5° C. perminute.

In case a melt of e. g. a hydrocarbon solvent is used for forming thedispersed phase, the solidifcation of the droplets may be effected bycooling the system using the temperature difference stated above.

Preferably, the “one phase” change as usable for forming an emulsion canalso be utilised for solidifying the catalytically active contentswithin the droplets of an emulsion system by, again, effecting atemperature change in the dispersed system, whereby the solvent used inthe droplets becomes miscible with the continuous phase, preferably afluorous continuous phase as defined above, so that the droplets becomeimpoverished of the solvent and the solidifying components remaining inthe “droplets” start to solidify. Thus the immisciblity can be adjustedwith respect to the solvents and conditions (temperature) to control thesolidification step.

The miscibility of e.g. organic solvents with fluorous solvents can befound from the literature and be chosen accordingly by a skilled person.Also the critical temperatures needed for the phase change are availablefrom the literature or can be determined using methods known in the art,e. g. the Hildebrand-Scatchard-Theorie. Reference is also made to thearticles of A. Enders and G. and of Pierandrea Lo Nostro cited above.

Thus according to the invention, the entire or only part of the dropletmay be converted to a solid form. The size of the “solidified”dropletmay be smaller or greaterthan that of the original droplet, e. g. if theamount of the monomer used for the prepolymerisation is relativelylarge.

The solid catalyst particles recovered can be used, after an optionalwashing step, in a polymerisation process of propylene. Alternatively,the separated and optionally washed solid particles can be dried toremove any solvent present in the particles before use in thepolymerisation step. The separation and optional washing steps can beeffected in a known manner, e. g. by filtration and subsequent washingof the solids with a suitable solvent.

The droplet shape of the particles may be substantially maintained. Theformed particles may have an average size range of 1 to 500 μm, e.g. 5to 500 μm, advantageously 5 to 200 μm or 10 to 150 μm. Even an averagesize range of 5 to 60 μm is possible. The size may be chosen dependingon the polymerisation the catalyst is used for. Advantageously, theparticles are essentially spherical in shape, they have a low porosityand a low surface area.

The formation of solution can be effected at a temperature of 0-100° C.,e.g. at 20-80° C. The dispersion step may be effected at −20° C.-100°C., e.g. at about −10-70° C., such as at −5 to 30° C., e.g. around 0° C.

To the obtained dispersion an emulsifying agent as defined above, may beadded to improve/stabilise the droplet formation. The solidification ofthe catalyst component in the droplets is preferably effected by raisingthe temperature of the mixture, e.g. from 0° C. temperature up to 100°C., e.g. up to 60-90° C., gradually. E.g. in 1 to 180 minutes, e.g. 1-90or 5-30 minutes, or as a rapid heat change. Heating time is dependent onthe size of the reactor.

During the solidification step, which is preferably carried out at about60 to 100° C., preferably at about 75 to 95° C., (below the boilingpoint of the solvents) the solvents may preferably be removed andoptionally the solids are washed with a wash solution, which can be anysolvent or mixture of solvents such as those defined above and/or usedin the art, preferably a hydrocarbon, such as pentane, hexane orheptane, suitably heptane. The washed catalyst can be dried or it can beslurried into an oil and used as a catalyst-oil slurry in polymerisationprocess.

All or part of the preparation steps can be done in a continuous manner.Reference is made to WO2006/069733 describing principles of such acontinuous or semicontinuous preparation methods of the solid catalysttypes, prepared via emulsion/solidification method.

Catalyst Off-Line Prepolymerisation

The use of the heterogeneous catalysts, where no external supportmaterial is used (also called “self-supported” catalysts) might have, asa drawback, a tendency to dissolve to some extent in the polymerisationmedia, i.e. some active catalyst components might leach out of thecatalyst particles during slurry polymerisation, whereby the originalgood morphology of the catalyst might be lost. These leached catalystcomponents are very active possibly causing problems duringpolymerisation. Therefore, the amount of leached components should beminimized, i.e. all catalyst components should be kept in heterogeneousform.

Furthermore, the self-supported catalysts generate, due to the highamount of catalytically active species in the catalyst system, hightemperatures at the beginning of the polymerisation which may causemelting of the product material. Both effects, i.e. the partialdissolving of the catalyst system and the heat generation, might causefouling, sheeting and deterioration of the polymer material morphology.

In order to minimise the possible problems associated with high activityor leaching, it is possible to “off line prepolymerise” the catalystbefore using it in polymerisation process.

It has to be noted that off line prepolymerisation in this regard ispart of the catalyst preparation process, being a step carried out aftera solid catalyst is formed. The catalyst off line prepolymerisation stepis not part of the actual polymerisation process configurationcomprising a prepolymerisation step. Afterthe catalyst off lineprepolymerisation step, the solid catalyst can be used inpolymerisation.

Catalyst “off line prepolymerisation” takes place following thesolidification step of the liquid-liquid emulsion process.Pre-polymerisation may take place by known methods described in the art,such as that described in WO 2010/052263, WO 2010/052260 or WO2010/052264. Preferable embodiments of this aspect of the invention aredescribed herein.

As monomers in the catalyst off-line prepolymerisation step preferablyalpha-olefins are used. Preferable C₂-C₁₀ olefins, such as ethylene,propylene, 1-butene, 1-pentene, 1-hexene, 4-methyl-1-pentene, 1-heptene,1-octene, 1-nonene 1-decene, styrene and vinylcyclohexene are used. Mostpreferred alpha-olefins are ethylene and propylene, especiallypropylene.

The catalyst off-line prepolymerisation may be carried out in gas phaseor in an inert diluent, typically oil or fluorinated hydrocarbon,preferably in fluorinated hydrocarbons or mixture of fluorinatedhydrocarbons. Preferably perfluorinated hydrocarbons are used. Themelting point of such (per)fluorinated hydrocarbons is typically in therange of 0 to 140° C., preferably 30 to 120° C. , like 50 to 110° C. .

Where the catalyst off line prepolymerisation is done in fluorinatedhydrocarbons, the temperature for the pre-polymerisation step is below70° C., e.g. in the range of −30 to 70° C., preferably 0-65° C. and morepreferably in the range 20 to 55° C. Pressure within the reaction vesselis preferably higher than atmospheric pressure to minimize the eventualleaching of air and/or moisture into the catalyst vessel. Preferably thepressure is in the range of at least 1 to 15 bar, preferably 2 to 10bar. The reaction vessel is preferably kept in an inert atmosphere, suchas under nitrogen or argon or similar atmosphere.

Offline prepolymerisation is continued until the desiredpre-polymerisation degree, defined as weight of polymer matrix/weight ofsolid catalyst before pre-polymerisation step, is reached. The degree isbelow 25, preferably 0.5 to 10.0, more preferably 1.0 to 8.0, mostpreferably 2.0 to 6.0.

Use of the off-line catalyst prepolymerisation step offers the advantageof minimising leaching of catalyst components and thus localoverheating.

After off line prepolymerisation, the catalyst can be isolated andstored.

Polymerisation

The catalysts according to the invention are especially suited to theformation of propylene homopolymers or propylene-ethlene copolymers. Theethylene content in such a propylene-ethylene polymer may vary dependingon the desired properties of the polymer. Typically ethylene contentwill range from 0.1 to 10 mol %. Especially, the catalysts of thepresent invention are used to manufacture propylene homopolymers orpropylene random copolymers with ethylene as comonomer.

Polymerization in the method of the invention may be effected in one ormore, e.g. 1, 2 or 3, polymerization reactors, using conventionalpolymerization techniques, e.g. gas phase, solution phase, slurry orbulk polymerization or combinations thereof, like a combination of aslurry and at least one gas phase reactor.

In case of propylene polymerisation for slurry reactors, the reactiontemperature will generally be in the range 60 to 110° C. (e.g. 60-90°C.), the reactor pressure will generally be in the range 5 to 80 bar(e.g. 20-60 bar), and the residence time will generally be in the range0.1 to 5 hours (e.g. 0.3 to 2 hours). The monomer is usually used asreaction medium.

For gas phase reactors, the reaction temperature used will generally bein the range 60 to 115° C. (e.g. 70 to 110° C.), the reactor pressurewill generally be in the range 10 to 25 bar, and the residence time willgenerally be 0.5 to δ hours (e.g. 0.5 to 4 hours). The gas used will bethe monomer optionally as mixture with a non-reactive gas such asnitrogen or propane. In addition to actual polymerisation steps andreactors, the process can contain any additional polymerisation steps,like prepolymerisation step, and any further after reactor handlingsteps as known in the art.

For solution polymerization, an aliphatic or aromatic solvent can beused to dissolve the monomer and the polymer, and the polymerizationtemperature will generally be in the range 80 to 200° C. (e.g. 90 to150° C.)

Generally the quantity of catalyst used will depend upon the nature ofthe catalyst, the reactor types and conditions and the propertiesdesired for the polymer product. As is well known in the art hydrogencan be used for controlling the molecular weight of the polymer.

The metallocene catalysts of the invention possess excellent catalystactivity and good comonomer response. The catalysts are also able toprovide polymers of high weight average molecular weight Mw.

Moreover, the random copolymerisation behaviour of metallocene catalystsof the invention shows a reduced tendency of chain transfer to ethylene.Polymers obtained with the metallocenes of the invention have normalparticle morphologies.

It is especially preferred if the catalysts of the invention are used inthe manufacture of heterophasic PP/EPR blends. These reactor blends maybe produced in two-steps (homopolypropylene in bulk+ ethylene-propylenerubber in gas phase) or three steps (hPP in bulk+ hPP in gas phase+ EPRin gas phase). Such polymers may typically be characterized by one ormore of the following features: EPR is fully soluble in xylene at roomtemperature. The iV(EPR) is above 2.0 dL/g when measured in decaline.The Mw/Mn of the hPP, as measured by GPC, is greaterthan 3.5.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a process for thepreparation of a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising:

-   (I) polymerising propylene in bulk in the presence of a catalyst as    herein defined to form a polypropylene homopolymer matrix;-   (II) in the presence of said matrix and said catalyst and in the gas    phase, polymerising propylene and ethylene to form a heterophasic    polypropylene copolymer comprising a homopolymer matrix and an    ethylene propylene rubber.

Viewed from another aspect the invention provides a process for thepreparation of a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising:

-   (I) polymerising propylene in bulk in the presence of a catalyst as    herein defined to form a polypropylene homopolymer;-   (II) in the presence of said homopolymer and said catalyst and in    the gas phase, polymerising propylene to form a polypropylene    homopolymer matrix;-   (III) in the presence said matrix and said catalyst and in the gas    phase, polymerising propylene and ethylene to form a heterophasic    polypropylene copolymer comprising a homopolymer matrix and an    ethylene propylene rubber (EPR).

In such a process, it is preferred if the EPR component is fully solublein xylene at room temperature. The EPR component may have a C2 contentof 15 to 60 wt %. It is preferred if the iV of the EPR is above 2.0 dL/gwhen measured in decaline. It is also preferred if the Mw/Mn of the hPPmatrix component, as measured by GPC, is broader than 3.5, such as 4.0to 8.0. The xylene soluble content may range from 15 to 60 wt %.

It will be appreciated that the catalyst may be subject toprepolymerisation as known in the art. The split between the steps mayvary. For a two step procedure, a suitable split is 40 to 70 wt % of EPRvs 30 to 60 wt % homopolymer component, such as 50 to 70 EPR vs 50 to 30wt % homopolymer. For a three step process, splits are preferably 30 to50 wt % in step (I), 30:50 wt % in step (II) and 10 to 30 wt % in step(III).

Polymers

It is a feature of the invention that the claimed catalysts enable theformation of polymers with high molecular weight. These features can beachieved at commercially interesting polymerisation temperatures, e.g.60° C. or more. It is a preferred feature of the invention that thecatalysts of the invention are used to polymerise propylene at atemperature of at least 60° C., preferably at least 65° C., such as atleast 70° C. In a particular embodiment, the propylene polymers obtainedusing the catalysts of the invention have a polydispersity index (Mw/Mn)of 2.0 or greater, such as 2.2-6.5. In particular, propylene polymersobtained in three-stage polymerisation processes can have broadpolydispersities of 4.5-6.2. Therefore, in a particular embodiment, thepropylene polymers of the invention may have a polydispersity index of2.0-7.0, such as 3.0-7.0, or 4.0-6.5.

Polypropylene Homopolymers

Polypropylene homopolymers made by the metallocenes of the invention canbe made with Mw (weight average molecular weight) values in the range of40 to 2 000 kg/mol, preferably in the range of 50 to 1 500 kg/moldepending on the use and amount of hydrogen used as Mw regulating agent.The catalysts of the invention enable the formation of polypropylenehomopolymers with high melting points. In a preferred embodiment thepropylene homopolymer formed by the process of the invention has amelting point of more than 149.0° C., preferably more than 149.5° C.,especially more than 150.0° C. Propylene homopolymers having meltingpoints up to 158.0° C. are possible.

Propylene-Ethylene Copolymers

Propylene-ethylene copolymers made by the metallocenes of the inventioncan be made with Mw values in the range of 40 to 2,000 kg/mol,preferably in the range of 50 to 1,500 kg/mol depending on the amount ofcomonomer content and/or use and amount of hydrogen used as Mwregulating agent. The polymers made by the catalysts of the inventionare useful in all kinds of end articles such as pipes, films (cast,blown or BOPP films, such as for example BOPP for capacitor film),fibers, moulded articles (e.g. injection moulded, blow moulded,rotomoulded articles), extrusion coatings and so on.

It has been found that certain heterophasic propylene-ethylenecopolymers obtained using the catalysts of the invention have highintrinsic viscosity (iV). In particular, values of 2.0 dl/g or more arepreferred such as 2.0 to 5.0 dl/g for the EPR component. The catalyststherefore enable the formation of high Mw EPR components.

The invention will now be illustrated by reference to the followingnon-limiting examples and figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 illustrates metal activities of the inventive examples andclosest references (comparative examples) in bulk propylenehomopolymerisation experiments. Both MC-E1 and MC-E2 demonstrateimproved performance over the references, while MC-E3 has performancecomparable to the 0-symmetric reference MC-CE1.

FIG. 2 illustrates polypropylene homopolymer melting temperatures forsamples produced with the inventive examples and closest references(comparative examples). Inventive examples provide at least roughly 2degrees higher melting temperature when compared to polymers producedusing the known 0-symmetric metallocenes. . The C₂-symmetric referencesprovide comparable or higher melting temperature, however, with clearlylower activity.

FIG. 3 illustrates metal activities of the inventive examples andclosest references (comparative examples) in ethylene-propylene randomcopolymerisation. All inventive examples provide clearly improvedperformance when compared to the references.

FIG. 4 illustrates Mw results for the propylene homopolymer samplesproduced with inventive examples and closest references (comparativeexamples) in bulk propylene homopolymerisation experiments. The Mwvalues are comparable to the results obtained with the Cl-symmetricreferences and improved over the result with the C₂-symmetricreferences.

FIG. 5 illustrates that catalysts of the invention provide high Mw inethylene-propylene random copolymerisation. Moreover, comparison of theresults in FIG. 5 and FIG. 4 shows that ethylene has a strong positiveeffect on Mw with the catalysts of the invention, while with MC-CE1,MC-CE2 and MC-CE4 Mw results are comparable. With MC-CE3, ethylene has astrong negative effect on Mw.

FIG. 6 illustrates productivity-MFR correlation for silica catalysts(2-step experiments). Productivities are based on metallocene amounts.

FIG. 7 illustrates composition—molecular weight correlation of therubber phase (xylene insoluble fraction) of heterophasic copolymersproduced with silica catalysts (3-step experiments).

ANALYTICAL TESTS Measurement Methods: Al and Zr Determination(ICP-Method)

The elementary analysisof a catalyst was performed by taking a solidsample of mass, M, cooling over dry ice. Samples were diluted up to aknown volume, V, by dissolving in nitric acid (HNO₃, 65%, 5% of V) andfreshly deionised (DI) water (5% of V). The solution was then added tohydrofluoric acid (HF, 40%, 3% of V), diluted with DI water up to thefinal volume, V, and left to stabilise for two hours.

The analysis was run at room temperature using a Thermo Elemental iCAP6300 Inductively Coupled Plasma—Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES)which was calibrated using a blank (a solution of 5% HNO₃, 3% HF in DIwater), and 6 standards of 0.5 ppm, 1 ppm, 10 ppm, 50 ppm, 100 ppm and300 ppm of Al, with 0.5 ppm, 1 ppm, 5 ppm, 20 ppm, 50 ppm and 100 ppm ofHf and Zr in solutions of 5% HNO3, 3% HF in DI water.

Immediately before analysis the calibration is ‘resloped’ using theblank and 100 ppm Al, 50 ppm Hf, Zr standard, a quality control sample(20 ppm Al, 5 ppm Hf, Zr in a solution of 5% HNO3, 3% HF in DI water) isrun to confirm the reslope. The QC sample is also run after every 5thsample and at the end of a scheduled analysis set.

The content of hafnium was monitored using the 282.022 nm and 339.980 nmlines and the content for zirconium using 339.198 nm line. The contentof aluminium was monitored via the 167.079 nm line, when Alconcentration in ICP sample was between 0-10 ppm (calibrated only to 100ppm) and via the 396.152 nm line for Al concentrations above 10 ppm.

The reported values are an average of three successive aliquots takenfrom the same sample and are related back to the original catalyst byinputting the original mass of sample and the dilution volume into thesoftware.

In the case of analysing the elemental composition of off-lineprepolymerised catalysts, the polymeric portion is digested by ashing insuch a way that the elements can be freely dissolved by the acids. Thetotal content is calculated to correspond to the weight-% for theprepolymerised catalyst.

DSC Analysis

Melting temperature Tm was measured on approx. 5 mg samples with aMettler-Toledo 822e differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), accordingto IS011357-3 in a heat/cool/heat cycle with a scan rate of 10° C./minin the temperature range of +23 to +225° C. under a nitrogen flow rateof 50 ml min⁻¹. Melting temperature was taken as the endotherm peak,respectively in the second heating step. Calibration of the instrumentwas performed with H₂0, Lead, Tin, Indium, according to ISO 11357-1.

Melt Flow Rate

The melt flow rate (MFR) is determined according to ISO 1133 and isindicated in g/10 min. The MFR is an indication of the flowability, andhence the processability, of the polymer. The higher the melt flow rate,the lower the viscosity of the polymer. The MFR is determined at 230° C.and may be determined at different loadings such as 2.16 kg (MFR₂) or21.6 kg (MFR₂₁).

Intrinsic Viscosity

Intrinsic viscosity (iV) has been measured according to DIN ISO 1628/1,October 1999 (in Decalin at 135° C.).

GPC: Molecular weight averages, molecular weight distribution, andpolydispersity index (M_(n), M_(w), M_(w)/M_(n))

Molecular weight averages (Mw, Mn), Molecular weight distribution (MWD)and its broadness, described by polydispersity index, PDI=Mw/Mn (whereinMn is the number average molecular weight and Mw is the weight averagemolecular weight) were determined by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC)according to ISO 16014-4:2003 and ASTM D 6474-99.

A PolymerChar GPC instrument, equipped with infrared (IR) detector wasused with 3× Olexis and 1× Olexis Guard columns from PolymerLaboratories and 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene (TCB, stabilized with 250 mg/L2,6-Di tert butyl-4-methyl-phenol) as solvent at 160° C. and at aconstant flow rate of 1 mL/min. 200 μL of sample solution were injectedper analysis. The column set was calibrated using universal calibration(according to ISO 16014-2:2003) with at least 15 narrow MWD polystyrene(PS) standards in the range of 0.5 kg/mol to 11 500 kg/mol. Mark Houwinkconstants for PS, PE and PP used are as described per ASTM D 6474-99.All samples were prepared by dissolving 5.0-9.0 mg of polymer in δ mL(at 160° C.) of stabilized TCB (same as mobile phase) for 2.5 hours forPP or 3 hours for PE at max. 160° C. under continuous gentle shaking inthe autosampler of the GPC instrument

Quantification of Polypropylene Homopolymer Microstructure by NMRSpectroscopy

Quantitative nuclear-magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used toquantify the isotacticity and content of regio-defects of thepolypropylene homopolymers. Quantitative ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectra recorded inthe solution-state using a Bruker Advance III 400 NMR spectrometeroperating at 400.15 and 100.62 MHz for ¹H and ¹³C respectively. Allspectra were recorded using a^(l-3)C optimised 10 mm selectiveexcitation probehead at 125° C. using nitrogen gas for all pneumatics.Approximately 200 mg of material was dissolved in1,2-tetrachloroethane-d₂ (TCE-d₂). This setup was chosen primarily forthe high resolution needed for tacticity distribution quantification(Busico, V., Cipullo, R., Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 (2001) 443; Busico, V.;Cipullo, R., Monaco, G., Vacatello, M., Segre, A. L., Macromolecules 30(1997) 6251). Standard single-pulse excitation was employed utilisingthe NOE and bi-level WALTZ16 decoupling scheme (Zhou, Z., Kuemmerle, R.,Qiu, X., Redwine, D., Cong, R., Taha, A., Baugh, D. Winniford, B., J.Mag. Reson. 187 (2007) 225; Busico, V., Carbonniere, P., Cipullo, R.,Pellecchia, R., Severn, J., Talarico, G., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2007,28, 11289). A total of 6144 (6k) transients were acquired per spectrausing a 3 s recycle delay. Quantitative ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectra wereprocessed, integrated and relevant quantitative properties determinedfrom the integrals using proprietary computer programs. All chemicalshifts are internally referenced to the methyl signal of the isotacticpentad mmmm at 21.85 ppm.

The tacticity distribution was quantified through integration of themethyl region between 23.6 and 19.7 ppm correcting for any sites notrelated to the stereo sequences of interest (Busico, V., Cipullo, R.,Prog. Polym. Sci. 26 (2001) 443; Busico, V., Cipullo, R., Monaco, G.,Vacatello, M., Segre, A. L., Macromolecules 30 (1997) 6251). The pentadisotacticity was determined through direct integration of the methylregion and reported as either the mole fraction or percentage ofisotactic pentad mmmm with respect to all steric pentads i.e.[mmmm]=mmmm/sum of all steric pentads. When appropriate integrals werecorrected for the presence of sites not directly associated with stericpentads.

Characteristic signals corresponding to regio irregular propeneinsertion were observed (Resconi, L., Cavallo, L., Fait, A., Piemontesi,F., Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1253). The presence of secondary insertedpropene in the form of 2.1 erythro regio defects was indicated by thepresence of the two methyl signals at 17.7 and 17.2 ppm and confirmed bythe presence of other characteristic signals. The amount of 2.1 erythroregio defects was quantified using the average integral (e) of the e6and e δ sites observed at 17.7 and 17.2 ppm respectively, i.e. e=0.5 *(e6+e8). Characteristic signals corresponding to other types of regioirregularity were not observed (Resconi, L., Cavallo, L., Fait, A.,Piemontesi, F., Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1253). The amount of primaryinserted propene (p) was quantified based on the integral of all signalsin the methyl region (CH3) from 23.6 to 19.7 ppm paying attention tocorrect for other species included in the integral not related toprimary insertion and for primary insertion signals excluded from thisregion such that p=CH3+2*e. The relative content of a specific type ofregio defect was reported as the mole fraction or percentage of saidregio defect with respect all observed forms of propene insertion i.e.sum of all primary (1.2), secondary (2.1) and tertiary (3.1) insertedpropene units, e.g. [21e]=e/(p+e+t+i). The total amount of secondaryinserted propene in the form of 2,1-erythro or 2,1-threo regio defectswas quantified as sum of all said regio irregular units, i.e.[21]=[21e]+[21t].

-   Quantification of Copolymer Microstructure by NMR Spectroscopy

Quantitative nuclear-magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy was used toquantify the comonomer content and comonomer distribution of thecopolymers, specifically propene-co-ethylene copolymers. Quantitative¹³C NMR spectra recorded in the solution-state using a Bruker AdvanceIII 400 NMR spectrometer operating at 400.15 and 100.62 MHz for ¹H and¹³C respectively. All spectra were recorded using a ¹³C optimised 10 mmselective excitation probehead at 125° C. using nitrogen gas for allpneumatics. Approximately 200 mg of material was dissolved in1,2-tetrachloroethane-d₂ (TCE-d₂) with chromium-(III)-acetylacetonate(Cr(acac)₃) resulting in a 65 mM solution of relaxation agent in solvent(Singh, G., Kothari, A., Gupta, V., Polymer Testing 28 5 (2009), 475).This setup was chosen primarily for the high resolution and quantitativespectra needed for accurate ethylene content determination. Standardsingle-pulse excitation was employed without NOE, using an optimised tipangle, 1 s recycle delay and bi-level WALTZ16 decoupling scheme (Zhou,Z., Kuemmerle, R., Qiu, X., Redwine, D., Cong, R., Taha, A., Baugh, D.Winniford, B., J. Mag. Reson. 187 (2007) 225; Busico, V., Carbonniere,P., Cipullo, R., Pellecchia, R., Severn, J., Talarico, G., Macromol.Rapid Commun. 2007, 28, 11289). A total of 6144 (6k) transients wereacquired per spectra. Quantitative ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectra were processed,integrated and relevant quantitative properties determined from theintegrals using proprietary computer programs. All chemical shifts wereindirectly referenced to the central methylene group of the ethyleneblock (EEE) at 30.00 ppm using the chemical shift of the solvent. Thisapproach allowed comparable referencing even when this structural unitwas not present.

Characteristic signals corresponding to regio irregular propeneinsertion were observed (Resconi, L., Cavallo, L., Fait, A., Piemontesi,F., Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 1253).].

Characteristic signals corresponding to the incorporation of ethylenewere observed (Cheng, H. N., Macromolecules 17, 1984, 1950). Thecomonomer content was calculated as the mole fraction or percent ofincorporated ethylene with respect to all monomer in the copolymer usingthe method of Wang et. al. (Wang, W-J., Zhu, S., Macromolecules 33,2000, 1157) through integration of multiple signals spanning the wholespectral ¹³C spectra. This analyse method was chosen for its robustnature and ability to account for the presence of regio irregularpropene insertion when needed. Integral regions were slightly adjustedto increase applicability across the whole range of encounteredcomonomer contents.

For systems where only isolated ethylene incorporation (PPEPP) wasobserved the method of Wang et. al. was modified to reduce the influenceof non-zero integrals used to quantify higher order comonomer sequences.In such cases the term for the absolute ethylene content was determinedbased upon only E=0.5(Sββ+Sβγ+Sβδ+0.5(Sαβ+Sαγ□)) orE=0.5(I_(h)+I_(G)+0.5(I_(C)+I_(D))) using the same notation as Wang et.al. (Wang, W-J., Zhu, S., Macromolecules 33, 2000, 1157). The term usedfor absolute propylene content (P) was not modified and the molefraction of ethylene calculated as [E]=E/(E+P). The comonomer content inweight percent was calculated from the mole fraction in the usual wayi.e. [E wt %]=100 * ([E] * 28.06)/(([E] * 28.06)+((1-[E]) * 42.08)).

EXAMPLES Metallocene Synthesis Reagents

2,6-Dimethylaniline (Acros), 1-bromo-3,5-dimethylbenzene (Acros),1-bromo-3,5-di-tert-butylbenzene (Acros),bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)imidazolium chloride (Aldrich),triphenylphosphine (Acros), NiCl₂(DME) (Aldrich), dichlorodimethylsilane(Merck), ZrCl₄ (Merck), trimethylborate (Acros), Pd(OAc)₂ (Aldrich),NaBH₄ (Acros), 2.5 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes (Chemetal), CuCN (Merck),magnesium turnings (Acros), silica gel 60, 40-63 μm (Merck), bromine(Merck), 96% sulfuric acid (Reachim), sodium nitrite (Merck), copperpowder (Alfa), potassium hydroxide (Merck), K₂CO₃ (Merck), 12 M HCl(Reachim), TsOH (Aldrich), MgSO₄ (Merck), Na₂CO₃ (Merck), Na₂SO₄ (AkzoNobel), methanol (Merck), diethyl ether (Merck), 1,2-dimethoxyethane(DME, Aldrich), 95% ethanol (Merck), dichloromethane (Merck), hexane(Merck), THF (Merck), and toluene (Merck) were used as received. Hexane,toluene and dichloromethane for organometallic synthesis were dried overmolecular sieves 4A (Merck). Diethyl ether, THF, and 1,2-dimethoxyethanefor organometallic synthesis were distilled over sodiumbenzophenoneketyl. CDCl₃ (Deutero GmbH) and CD₂CL₂ (Deutero GmbH) weredried over molecular sieves 4A.4-Bromo-6-tert-butyl-5-methoxy-2-methylindan-1-one was obtained asdescribed in WO2013/007650.

Synthesisof MC IE14-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-1-methoxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene

The precursor4-bromo-1-methoxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene was madeaccording to the procedure described in WO2015/158790 A2 (pp 26-29).

To a mixture of 1.5 g (1.92 mmol, 0.6 mol. %) of NiCl₂(PPh₃)IPr and 89.5g (318.3 mmol) of4-bromo-1-methoxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene, 500 ml (500mmol, 1.57 equiv) of 1.0 M 4-tert-butylphenylmagnesium bromide in THFwas added. The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h, then cooled toroom temperature, and 1000 ml of 0.5 M HCl was added. Further on, thismixture was extracted with 1000 ml of dichloromethane, the organic layerwas separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted with 250 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined organic extract was evaporated to drynessto give a greenish oil. The title product was isolated byflash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent:hexanes-dichloromethane=3:1, vol., then 1:3, vol.). This procedure gave107 g (ca. 100%) of1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indaceneas a white solid mass.

Anal. calc. for C₂₄H₃₀O: C, 86.18; H, 9.04. Found: C, 85.99; H, 9.18.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃), syn-isomer: δ 7.42-7.37 (m, 2H), 7.25-7.20 (m, 3H), 4.48(d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.44 (s, 3H), 2.99-2.47 (m, 7H), 2.09-1.94 (m, 2H),1.35 (s, 9H), 1.07 (d, J=6.9 Hz, 3H); Anti-isomer: δ 7.42-7.37 (m, 2H),7.25-7.19 (m, 3H), 4.39 (d, J=3.9 Hz, 1H), 3.49 (s, 3H), 3.09 (dd,J=15.9 Hz, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.94 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (tm, J=7.3 Hz,2H), 2.51-2.39 (m, 1H), 2.29 (dd, J=15.9 Hz, J=5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (quin,J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 1.11 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl₃), syn-isomer: δ 149.31, 142.71, 142.58, 141.46, 140.03, 136.71,135.07, 128.55, 124.77, 120.02, 86.23, 56.74, 39.41, 37.65, 34.49,33.06, 32.45, 31.38, 25.95, 13.68; Anti-isomer: δ 149.34, 143.21,142.90, 140.86, 139.31, 136.69, 135.11, 128.49, 124.82, 119.98,91.53,56.50, 40.12, 37.76, 34.50, 33.04, 32.40, 31.38, 25.97, 19.35.

4-(4-tert-Butylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene

To a solution of 107 g1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene(prepared above) in 700 ml of toluene, 600 mg of TsOH was added, and theresulting solution was refluxed using Dean-Stark head for 10 min. Aftercooling to room temperature the reaction mixture was washed with 200 mlof 10% NaHCO₃. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layerwas additionally extracted with 2×100 ml of dichloromethane. Thecombined organic extract was evaporated to dryness to give a red oil.The product was purified by flash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63μm; eluent: hexanes, then hexanes-dichloromethane=5:1, vol.) followed byvacuum distillation, b.p. 210-216° C./5-6 mm Hg. This procedure gave77.1 g (80%) of4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene as ayellowish glassy material.

Anal. calc. for C₂₃H₂₆: C, 91.34; H, 8.66. Found: C, 91.47; H, 8.50.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.44-7.37 (m, 2H), 7.33-7.26 (m, 2H), 7.10 (s, 1H),6.45 (br.s, 1H), 3.17 (s, 2H), 2.95 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (t, J=7.3Hz, 2H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 2.02 (quin, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.37 (s, 9H). ¹³C{¹H}NMR (CDCl₃): δ 149.37, 145.54, 144.79, 142.91, 139.92, 138.05, 137.15,134.06, 128.36, 127.02, 124.96, 114.84, 42.11, 34.53, 33.25, 32.16,31.41, 25.96, 16.77.

2-methyl-[4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilane

To a solution of 22.3 g (73.73 mmol) of4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene in 300 mlof ether, cooled to −50° C., 30.4 ml (73.87 mmol) of 2.43 M “BuLi inhexanes was added in one portion. The resulting mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature, then the resulting suspension with alarge amount of precipitate was cooled to −78° C. (wherein theprecipitate was substantially dissolved to form an orange solution), and47.6 g (369 mmol, 5 equiv.) of dichlorodimethylsilane was added in oneportion. The obtained solution was stirred overnight at room temperatureand then filtered through a glass frit (G4). The filtrate was evaporatedto dryness to give 28.49 g (98%) of2-methyl-[4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilane as a colorless glass which was used without furtherpurification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7-50-7.45 (m, 2H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.35-7.32 (m, 2H),6.60 (s, 1H), 3.60 (s, 1H), 3.10-2.82 (m, 4H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 2.08 (quin,J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 0.48 (s, 3H), 0.22 (s, 3H). ¹³C₁ ¹F11 NMR(CDCl₃): δ 149.27, 144.41, 142.15, 141.41, 139.94, 139.83, 136.85,130.19, 129.07, 126.88, 124.86, 118.67, 49.76, 34.55, 33.27, 32.32,31.44, 26.00, 17.6

2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one

A mixture of 31.1 g (100 mmol) of2-methyl-4-bromo-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one, 25.0 g (140 mmol)of 4-tert-butylphenylboronic acid, 29.4 g (280 mmol) of Na₂CO₃, 1.35 g(6.00 mmol, 6 mol. %) of Pd(OAc)2, and 3.15 g (12.0 mmol, 12 mol. %) ofPPh₃ in 130 ml of water and 380 ml of DME was refluxed for 6 h in argonatmosphere. The formed mixture was evaporated to dryness. To the residue500 ml of dichloromethane and 500 ml of water were added. The organiclayer was separated, the aqueous layer was additionally extracted with100 ml of dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was dried overNa₂SO₄, evaporated to dryness, and the crude product was isolated usingflash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent:hexanes-dichloromethane=2:1, vol.). This crude product wasrecrystallized from n-hexane to give 29.1 g (81%) of a white solid.

Anal. calc. for C₂₅H₃₂O₂: C, 82.37; H, 8.85. Found: C, 82.26; H, 8.81.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.74 (s, 1H, 7-H in indenyl), 7.48 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H,2,6-H in C₆H₄ ^(t)Bu), 7.33 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H, 3,5-H in C₆H4^(t)Bu), 3.27(s, 3H, OMe), 3.15 (dd, J=17.3 Hz, J=7.7 Hz, 1H, 3-H in indan-1-on),2.67-2.59 (m, 1H, 2-H in indan-1-on), 2.48 (dd, J=17.3 Hz, J=3.7 Hz,3′-H in indan-1-on), 1.42 (s, 9H, ^(t)Bu in C₆H₄ ^(t)Bu), 1.38 (s, 9H,6-^(t)Bu in indan-1-on), 1.25 (d, J=7.3 Hz, 3H, 2-Me in indan-1-one).

2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-indene

To a solution of 28.9 g (79.2 mmol) of2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one in400 ml of THF cooled to 5° C. 5.00 g (132 mmol) of NaBH₄ was added.Further on, 100 ml of methanol was added dropwise to this mixture byvigorous stirring for ca. 7 h at 5° C. The resulting mixture wasevaporated to dryness, and the residue wad partitioned between 500 ml ofdichloromethane and 1000 ml of 0.5 M HCl. The organic layer wasseparated, the aqueous layer was additionally extracted with 100 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined organic extract was evaporated to drynessto give a colorless oil. To a solution of thisoil in 500 ml of toluene1.0 g of TsOH was added. The formed mixture was refluxed with Dean-Starkhead for 15 min and then cooled to room temperature using water bath.The resulting reddish solution was washed by 10% aqueous Na₂CO₃, theorganic layer was separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with 2×100ml of dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was dried over K₂CO₃and then passed through short pad of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm). Thesilica gel pad was additionally washed with 50 ml of dichloromethane.The combined organic elute was evaporated to dryness to give a yellowishcrystalline mass. The product was isolated by re-crystallization of thismass from 150 ml of hot n-hexane. Crystals precipitated at 5° C. werecollected dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 23.8 g of whitemacrocrystalline2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-indene. Themother liquor was evaporated to dryness and the residue wasrecrystallized from 20 ml of hot n-hexane in the same way. Thisprocedure gave additional 2.28 g of the product. Thus, the total yieldof the title product was 26.1 g (95%).

Anal. calc. for C₂₅H₃₂O: C, 86.15; H, 9.25. Found: C, 86.24; H, 9.40.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.44 (d, J=8.5 Hz, 2H, 2,6-H in C₆H₄ ^(t)Bu), 7.40 (d,J=8.5 Hz, 2H, 3,5-H in C₆H₄ ^(t)Bu), 7.21 (s, 1H, 4-H in indenyl), 6.43(m, 1H, 3-H in indenyl), 3.20 (s, 3H, OMe), 3.15 (s, 2H, 1-H inindenyl), 2.05 (s, 3H, 2-Me in indenyl), 1.43 (s, 9H, 5-^(t)Bu inindenyl), 1.37 (s, 9H, ^(t)Bu in C₆H₄ ^(t)Bu).

[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

To a solution of 8.38 g (24.04 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-7-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-6-methoxy-1H-indene in 150ml of ether 9.9 ml (24.06 mmol) of 2.43 M nBuLi in hexanes was added inone portion at −50° C. This mixture was stirred overnight at roomtemperature, then the resulting yellow solution with yellow precipitatewas cooled to −50° C., and 150 mg of CuCN was added. The obtainedmixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −25° C., then a solution of 9.5 g(24.05 mmol) of2-methyl-[4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilanein 150 ml of ether was added in one portion. This mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature, then filtered through a pad of silica gel60 (40-63 μm), which was additionally washed by 2×50 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined filtrate was evaporated under reducedpressure, and the residue was dried in vacuum at elevated temperature.This procedure gave 17.2 g (ca. 100%) of[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(ca. 95% purity by NMR spectroscopy, approx. 1:1 mixture ofstereoisomers) as yellowish glassy solid which was used in the next stepwithout additional purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.50 (s, 0.5H), 7.48-7.41 (m, 6H), 7.37-7.33 (m,2.5H), 7.26 (s, 0.5H), 7.22 (s, 0.5H), 6.57 and 6.50 (2s, sum 2H), 3.71,3.69, 3.67 and 3.65 (4s, sum 2H), 3.23 and 3.22 (2s, sum 3H), 3.03-2.80(m, 4H), 2.20, 2.16 and 2.14 (3s, sum 6H), 2.08-1.99 (m, 2H), 1.43 and1.41 (2s, sum 9H), 1.39 (s, 18H), −0.19, −0.20, −0.21 and −0.23 (4s, sum6H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 155.49, 155.46, 149.41, 149.14, 149.11,147.48, 147.44, 146.01, 145.77, 143.95, 143.91, 143.76, 143.71, 142.14,142.10, 139.52, 139.42, 139.34, 139.29, 139.20, 139.16, 137.10, 137.05,137.03, 135.20, 130.05, 130.03, 129.73, 129.11, 127.25, 127.22, 126.20,126.13, 125.98, 125.94, 125.05, 124.82, 120.59, 120.52, 118.51, 118.26,60.51, 60.48, 47.31, 46.89, 46.72, 35.14, 34.55, 33.34, 33.28, 32.30,31.47, 31.45, 31.24, 31.19, 26.02, 25.99, 17.95, 17.86.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride

To a solution of 17.2 g (ca. 24.04 mol) of[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(prepared above) in 250 ml of ether, cooled to −50° C., 19.8 ml (48.11mmol) of 2.43 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes was added in one portion. Thismixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature, then the resultingcherry-red solution was cooled to −60° C., and 5.7 g (24.46 mmol) ofZrCl₄ was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at roomtemperature to give red solution with orange precipitate. This mixturewas evaporated to dryness. The residue was heated with 200 ml oftoluene, and the formed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4).The filtrate was evaporated to 90 ml. Yellow powder precipitated fromthis solution overnight at room temperature was collected, washed with10 ml of cold toluene, and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 4.6 g(22%) of a ca. 4 to 1 mixture of anti- and syn-zirconocenes. The motherliquor was evaporated to ca. 40 ml, and 20 ml of n-hexane was added.Orange powder precipitated from this solution overnight at roomtemperature was collected and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 6.2 g(30%) of a ca. 1 to 1 mixture of anti- and syn-zirconocenes. Thus, thetotal yield of anti- and syn-zirconocenes isolated in this synthesis was10.8 g (52%). Pure anti-zirconocene was obtained after crystallizationof the above-described 4.6 g sample of a ca. 4 to 1 mixture of anti- andsyn-zirconocenes from 20 ml of toluene. This procedure gave 1.2 g ofpure anti-zirconocene.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride:

Anal. calc. for C₅₀H₆₀Cl₂OSiZr: C, 69.25; H, 6.97. Found: C, 69.43; H,7.15.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.59-7.38 (group of m, 10H), 6.74 (s, 1H), 6.61 (s,1H), 3.37 (s, 3H), 3.08-2.90 (m, 3H), 2.86-2.78 (m, 1H), 2.20 (s, 3H),2.19 (s, 3H), 2.10-1.92 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 1.33 (s, 18H), 1.30 (s,3H), 1.29 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl_(3,)): δ 159.94, 150.05, 149.86,144.79, 144.01, 143.20, 135.50, 135.41, 133.87, 133.73, 133.62, 132.82,132.29, 129.23, 128.74, 126.95, 126.87, 125.36, 125.12, 122.93, 121.68,121.32, 120.84, 117.90, 81.65, 81.11, 62.57, 35.74, 34.58, 33.23, 32.17,31.37, 31.36, 30.32, 26.60, 18.39, 18.30, 2.65, 2.57¹. ¹ Resonanceoriginated from one carbon atom was not found because of overlappingwith some other signal.

Synthesisof MC-IE2 4-Bromo-2,6-dimethylaniline

159.8 g (1.0 mol) of bromine was slowly (over 2 h) added to a stirredsolution of 121.2 g (1.0 mol) of 2,6-dimethylaniline in 500 ml ofmethanol. The resulting dark-red solution was stirred overnight at roomtemperature, then poured into a cold solution of 140 g (2.5 mol) ofpotassium hydroxide in 1100 ml of water. The organic layer wasseparated, and the aqueous one was extracted with 500 ml of diethylether. The combined organic extract was washed with 1000 ml of water,dried over K₂CO₃, and evaporated in vacuum to give 202.1 g of4-bromo-2,6-dimethylaniline (purity ca. 90%) as dark-red oil whichcrystallized upon standing at room temperature. This material wasfurther used without additional purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.04 (s, 2H), 3.53 (br.s, 2H), 2.13 (s, 6H).

1-Bromo-3,5-dimethylbenzene

97 ml (1.82 mol) of 96% sulfuric acid was added dropwise to a solutionof 134.7 g (ca. 673 mmol) of 4-bromo-2,6-dimethylaniline (preparedabove, purity ca. 90%) in 1400 ml of 95% ethanol cooled to −10° C., at asuch a rate to maintain the reaction temperature below 7° C. Aftertheaddition was complete, the solution was stirred at room temperature for1 h. Then, the reaction mixture was cooled in an ice-bath, and asolution of 72.5 g (1.05 mol) of sodium nitrite in 150 ml of water wasadded dropwise over ca. 1 h. The formed solution was stirred at the sametemperature for 30 min. Then the cooling bath was removed, and 18 g ofcopper powder was added. Upon completion of the rapid evolution ofnitrogen additional portions (ca. 5 g each, ca.50 g in total) of copperpowder were added with 10 min intervals until gas evolution ceasedcompletely. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperatureovernight, then filtered through a glass frit (G3), diluted withtwo-fold volume of water, and the crude product was extracted with 4×150ml of dichloromethane. The combined extract was dried over K₂CO₃,evaporated to dryness, and then distilled in vacuum (b.p. 60-63° C./5 mmHg) to give a yellowish liquid. This product was additionally purifiedby flash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent: hexane) anddistilled once again (b.p. 51-52° C./3 mm Hg) to give 63.5 g (51%) of1-bromo-3,5-dimethylbenzene as a colorless liquid.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.12 (s, 2H), 6.89 (s, 1H), 2.27 (s, 6H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl₃): δ 139.81, 129.03, 128.61, 122.04, 20.99.

(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)boronic acid

A solution of 3,5-dimethylphenylmagnesium bromide obtained from asolution of 190.3 g (1.03 mol) of 1-bromo-3,5-dimethylbenzene in 1000 mlof THF and 32 g (1.32 mol, 28% excess) of magnesium turnings was cooledto −78° C., and 104 g (1.0 mol) of trimethylborate was added in oneportion. The resulting heterogeneous mixture was stirred overnight atroom temperature. The boronic ester was hydrolyzed by careful additionof 1200 ml of 2 M HCl. 500 ml of diethyl ether was added, the organiclayer was separated, and the aqueous layer was additionally extractedwith 2×500 ml of diethyl ether. The combined organic extract was driedover Na₂SO₄ and then evaporated to dryness to give white mass. Thelatter was triturated with 200 ml of n-hexane, filtered through glassfrit (G3), and the precipitate was dried in vacuo. This procedure gave114.6 g (74%) of (3,5-dimethylphenyl)boronic acid.

Anal. calc. for C₈H₁₁BO₂: C, 64.06; H, 7.39. Found: C, 64.38; H, 7.72.

¹H NMR (DMSO-d₆): δ 7.38 (s, 2H), 7.00 (s, 1H), 3.44(very br.s, 2H),2.24 (s, 6H).

2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one

A mixture of 49.14 g (157.9 mmol) of2-methyl-4-bromo-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindan-1-one, 29.6 g (197.4 mmol,1.25 eq.) of (3,5-dimethylphenyl)boronic acid, 45.2 g (427 mmol) ofNa₂CO₃, 1.87 g (8.3 mmol, 5 mol. %) of Pd(OAc)₂, 4.36 g (16.6 mmol, 10mol. %) of PPh₃, 200 ml of water, and 500 ml of 1,2-dimethoxyethane wasrefluxed for 6.5 h. DME was evaporated on a rotary evaporator, 600 ml ofwater and 700 ml of dichloromethane were added to the residue. Theorganic layer was separated, and the aqueous one was additionallyextracted with 200 ml of dichloromethane. The combined extract was driedover K₂CO₃ and then evaporated to dryness to give a black oil. The crudeproduct was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm,hexane-dichloromethane=1:1, vol., then, 1:3, vol.) to give 48.43 g (91%)of 2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindan-1-one asa brownish oil.

Anal. calc. for C₂₃H₂₈O₂: C, 82.10; H, 8.39. Found: C, 82.39; H, 8.52.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.02 (s, 3H), 7.01 (s, 3H), 3.32 (s,3H), 3.13 (dd, J=17.5 Hz, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.68-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.44 (dd,J=17.5 Hz, J=3.9 Hz), 2.36 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 1.25 (d, J=7.5 Hz,3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 208.90, 163.50, 152.90, 143.32, 138.08,136.26, 132.68, 130.84, 129.08, 127.18, 121.30, 60.52, 42.17, 35.37,34.34, 30.52, 21.38, 16.40.

2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene

8.2 g (217 mmol) of NaBH₄ was added to a solution of 48.43 g (143.9mmol) of2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylindan-1-one in 300ml of THF cooled to 5° C. Then, 150 ml of methanol was added dropwise tothis mixture by vigorous stirring for ca. 7 h at 5° C. The resultingmixture was evaporated to dryness, and the residue was partitionedbetween 500 ml of dichloromethane and 500 ml of 2 M HCl. The organiclayer was separated, the aqueous layer was additionally extracted with100 ml of dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was evaporatedto dryness to give a slightly yellowish oil. To a solution of thisoil in600 ml of toluene 400 mg of TsOH was added, this mixture was refluxedwith Dean-Stark head for 10 min and then cooled to room temperatureusing a water bath. The formed solution was washed by 10% Na₂CO₃, theorganic layer was separated, the aqueous layer was extracted with 150 mlof dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was dried over K₂CO₃and then passed through a short layer of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm). Thesilica gel layer was additionally washed by 100 ml of dichloromethane.The combined organic elute was evaporated to dryness, and the resultingoil was dried in vacuum at elevated temperature. This procedure gave45.34 g (98%) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene whichwas used without additional purification.

Anal. calc. for C₂₃H₂₈O: C, 86.20; H, 8.81. Found: C, 86.29; H, 9.07.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.20 (s, 1H), 7.08 (br.s, 1H), 6.98 (br.s, 1H), 6.42(m, 1H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 2H), 2.36 (s, 6H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.43(s, 9H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 154.20, 145.22, 141.78, 140.82, 140.64,138.30, 137.64, 131.80, 128.44, 127.18, 126.85, 116.98, 60.65, 42.80,35.12, 31.01, 21.41, 16.65.

[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-Butyl-1H-inden-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilane

To a solution of 9.0 g (28.08 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene in 150ml of ether, cooled to −50° C., 11.6 ml (28.19 mmol) of 2.43 M ^(n)BuLiin hexanes was added in one portion. The resulting mixture was stirredfor 6 h at room temperature, then the obtained yellow suspension wascooled to −60° C., and 18.1 g (140.3 mmol, 5 equiv.) ofdichlorodimethylsilane was added in one portion. The obtained solutionwas stirred overnight at room temperature and then filtered through aglass frit (G3). The filtrate was evaporated to dryness to give[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-Butyl-1H-inden-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilaneas a slightly yellowish oil which was further used without an additionalpurification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.38 (s, 1H), 7.08 (s, 2H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.43 (s,1H), 3.53 (s, 1H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 2.37 (s, 6H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 1.43 (s,9H), 0.43 (s, 3H), 0.17 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 155.78, 145.88,143.73, 137.98, 137.56, 137.49, 136.74, 128.32, 127.86, 127.55, 126.64,120.86, 60.46, 49.99, 35.15, 31.16, 21.41, 17.55, 1.11, −0.58.

1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene

To a mixture of 2.0 g (2.56 mmol, 1.8 mol. %) of NiCl₂(PPh₃)IPr and 40.0g (142.3 mmol) of4-bromo-1-methoxy-2-methyl-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene, 200 ml (200mmol, 1.4 eq) of 3,5-dimethylphenylmagnesium bromide 1.0 M in THF wasadded. The resulting solution was refluxed for 3 h, then cooled to roomtemperature, and 400 ml of water followed by 500 ml of 1.0 M HClsolution were added. Further on, this mixture was extracted with 600 mlof dichloromethane, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueouslayer was extracted with 2×100 ml of dichloromethane. The combinedorganic extract was evaporated to dryness to give a slightly greenishoil. The product was isolated by flash-chromatography on silica gel 60(40-63 μm; eluent: hexanes-dichloromethane=2:1, vol., then 1:2, vol.).This procedure gave 43.02 g (99%) of1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indaceneas a colorless thick oil as a mixture of two diastereoisomers.

Anal. calc. for C₂₂H₂₆O: C, 86.23; H, 8.55. Found: C, 86.07; H, 8.82.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃), Syn-isomer: δ 7.21 (s, 1H), 6.94 (br.s, 1H), 6.90 (br.s,2H), 4.48 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 2.94 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H),2.87-2.65 (m, 3H), 2.63-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.33 (s, 6H), 2.02 (quin, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 1.07 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); Anti-isomer: δ 7.22 (s, 1H), 6.94(br.s, 1H), 6.89 (br.s, 2H), 4.38 (d, J=4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (s, 3H), 3.06(dd, J=16.0 Hz, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (td, J=7.3Hz, J=3.2 Hz, 2H), 2.51-2.40 (m, 1H), 2.34 (s, 6H), 2.25 (dd, J=16.0 Hz,J=5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (quin, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H).¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃), Syn-isomer: δ 142.69, 142.49, 141.43, 139.97,139.80, 137.40, 135.46, 128.34, 126.73, 120.09, 86.29, 56.76, 39.43,37.59, 33.11, 32.37, 25.92, 21.41, 13.73; Anti-isomer: δ 143.11, 142.72,140.76, 139.72, 139.16, 137.37, 135.43, 128.29, 126.60, 119.98,91.53,56.45, 40.06, 37.65, 33.03, 32.24, 25.88, 21.36, 19.36.

4-(3,5-Dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene

To the solution of 43.02 g (140.4 mmol)1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacenein 600 ml of toluene, 200 mg of TsOH was added, and the resultingsolution was refluxed using Dean-Stark head for 15 min. After cooling toroom temperature the reaction mixture was washed with 200 ml of 10%NaHCO₃. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer wasadditionally extracted with 300 ml of dichloromethane. The combinedorganic extract was evaporated to dryness to give light orange oil. Theproduct was isolated by flash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm;eluent: hexanes, then hexanes-dichloromethane=10:1, vol.). Thisprocedure gave 35.66 g (93%) of4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene as aslightly yellowish oil which spontaneously solidified to form a whitemass.

Anal. calc. for C₂₁H₂₂: C, 91.92; H, 8.08. Found: C, 91.78; H, 8.25.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.98 (br.s, 2H), 6.96 (br.s, 1H), 6.44(m, 1H), 3.14 (s, 2H), 2.95 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H),2.35 (s, 6H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 2.02 (quin, J=7.3 Hz, 2H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl₃): δ 145.46, 144.71, 142.81, 140.17, 139.80, 137.81, 137.50,134.33, 128.35, 127.03, 126.48, 114.83, 42.00, 33.23, 32.00, 25.87,21.38, 16.74.

[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-Butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

To a solution of 7.71 g (28.1 mmol) of4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene in amixture of 150 ml of ether and 20 ml of THF 11.6 ml (28.19 mmol) of 2.43M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes was added in one portion at −50° C. This mixturewas stirred for 6 h at room temperature, then the resulting orangesolution was cooled to −50° C., and 150 mg of CuCN was added. Theobtained mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −25° C., then a solution of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilane(prepared above, ca. 28.08 mmol) in 150 ml of ether was added in oneportion. This mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, thenfiltered through a pad of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm), which wasadditionally washed by 2×50 ml of dichloromethane. The combined filtratewas evaporated under reduced pressure to give a yellow oil. The productwas isolated by flash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent:hexanes-dichloromethane=10:1, vol., then 5:1, vol.). This procedure gave11.95 g (65%) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-Butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(as ca. 1:1 mixture of stereoisomers) as a yellowish glassy solid.

Anal. calc. for C₄₆H₅₄OSi: C, 84.87; H, 8.36. Found: C, 85.12; H, 8.59.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.48 and 7.33 (2s, sum 1H), 7.26-7.18 (m, 1H),7.16-7.07 (m, 2H), 7.04-6.95 (m, 4H), 6.51 and 6.45 (2s, sum 2H), 3.69and 3.65 (2s, sum 2H), 3.28 and 3.26 (2s, sum 3H), 3.01-2.74 (m, 4H),2.38 ad 2.37 (2s, sum 12H), 2.20 and 2.15 (2s, sum 6H), 2.09-1.97 (m,2H), 1.43 and 1.42 (2s, sum 9H), −0.17, −0.18, −0.19 and −0.24 (4s, sum6H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 155.29, 147.45, 147.39, 145.99, 145.75,143.93, 143.90, 143.72, 143.69, 142.06, 142.01, 140.08, 140.06, 139.46,139.37, 139.26, 139.03, 139.00, 138.24, 137.50, 137.34, 137.07, 136.99,130.39, 128.23, 128.14, 127.92, 127.50, 127.46, 127.26, 126.12, 126.05,125.99, 125.94, 120.55, 120.51, 118.46, 118.27, 60.49, 47.33, 46.86,46.76, 35.14, 33.33, 33.28, 32.18, 31.26, 31.21, 25.95, 25.91, 21.44,17.96, 17.88,−5.27, −5.39, −5.50, −5.82.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride

To a solution of 11.95 g (18.36 mol) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(prepared above) in 200 ml of ether, cooled to −50° C., 15.1 ml (35.7mmol) of 2.43 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes was added in one portion. Thismixture was stirred for 3 h at room temperature, then the resulting redsolution was cooled to −78° C., and 4.28 g (18.37 mmol) of ZrCl₄ wasadded. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature togive light red solution with orange precipitate. This mixture wasevaporated to dryness. The residue was treated with 250 ml of hottoluene, and the formed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4).The filtrate was evaporated to 40 ml. Red powder precipitated from thissolution overnight at room temperature was collected, washed with 10 mlof cold toluene, and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 0.6 g ofsyn-zirconocene. The mother liquor was evaporated to ca. 35 ml, and 15ml of n-hexane was added to the warm solution. The red powderprecipitated from this solution overnight at room temperature wascollected and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 3.49 gsyn-zirconocene. The mother liquor was evaporated to ca. 20 ml, and 30ml of n-hexane was added to the warm solution. The yellow powderprecipitated from this solution overnight at room temperature wascollected and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 4.76 ganti-zirconocene as a solvate with toluene (×0.6 toluene) contaminatedwith ca. 2% of syn-isomer. Thus, the total yield of syn- andanti-zirconocenes isolated in this synthesis was 8.85 g (59%).

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride:

Anal. calc. for C₄₆H₅₂Cl₂OSiZr×0.6C₇H₈: C, 69.59; H, 6.61. Found: C,69.74; H, 6.68.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.47 (s, 1H), 7.40 (s, 1H), 7.37-7.03 (m, 4H), 6.95(s, 2H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 3.03-2.96 (m, 2H),2.96-2.87 (m, 1H), 2.87-2.76 (m, 1H), 2.34 and 2.33 (2s, sum 12H), 2.19and 2.18 (2s, sum 6H), 2.06-1.94 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 1.28 (s, 3H),1.27 (s, 3H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl_(3,)): δ 159.73, 144.59, 143.99, 143.00,138.26, 137.84, 137.59, 136.80, 135.35, 133.85, 133.63, 132.95, 132.52,128.90, 128.80, 127.40, 126.95, 126.87, 126.65, 122.89, 121.61, 121.53,120.82, 117.98, 81.77, 81.31, 62.62, 35.73, 33.20, 32.12, 30.37, 26.49,21.47, 21.38, 18.40, 18.26, 2.64, 2.54.

Syn-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride.

Anal. calc. for C₄₆H₅₂Cl₂OSiZr: C, 68.11; H, 6.46. Found: C, 68.37; H,6.65.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.51 (s, 1H), 7.39 (s, 1H), 7.36-6.99 (m, 4H), 6.95(s, 2H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 3.27 (s, 3H), 2.91-2.75 (m, 4H),2.38 and 2.34 (2s, sum 18H), 1.99-1.87 (m, 1H), 1.87-1.74 (m, 1H), 1.42(s, 3H), 1.36 (s, 9H), 1.19 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl_(3,)): δ 158.74,143.41, 142.84, 142.31, 138.30, 137.77, 137.55, 136.85, 135.87, 135.73,134.99, 134.75, 131.64, 128.83, 128.76, 127.97, 127.32, 126.82, 126.22,123.91, 121.35, 121.02, 120.85, 118.56, 83.47, 83.08, 62.32, 35.53,33.33, 31.96, 30.33, 26.53, 21.45 (two resonances), 18.56, 18.43, 2.93,2.65.

Alternative Synthesisof MC-IE2

2-methyl-4-bromo-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one isobtained asdescribed above.

One pot Synthesisof2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene from2-methyl-4-bromo-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one

Step 1: 2 mol. % Pd(P^(t)Bu3)2, 2-MeTHF, 7 h at reflux

A mixture of 2-methyl-4-bromo-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one (15.75g, 50.61 mmol), (3,5-dimethylphenyl)boronic acid (9.5 g, 63.34 mmol,1.25 equiv.), Na₂CO₃ (14.5 g, 137 mmol), Pd(P^(t)Bu₃)2 (0.51 g, 1 mmol),66 ml of water and 165 ml of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran was refluxed for 7h. After cooling to room temperature, the organic layer was separated,dried over K₂CO₃, and the resulting solution was used in the followingstep without additional purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.73 (s, 1H), 7.02 (s, 3H), 7.01 (s, 3H), 3.32 (s,3H), 3.13 (dd, J=17.5 Hz, J=7.8 Hz, 1H), 2.68-2.57 (m, 1H), 2.44 (dd,J=17.5 Hz, J=3.9 Hz), 2.36 (s, 6H), 1.42 (s, 9H), 1.25 (d, J=7.5 Hz,3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 208.90, 163.50, 152.90, 143.32, 138.08,136.26, 132.68, 130.84, 129.08, 127.18, 121.30, 60.52, 42.17, 35.37,34.34, 30.52, 21.38, 16.40

Step 2: a) NaBH_(4/2)-MeTHF/MeOH; b) TsOH/toluene at reflux

NaBH₄ (5.2 g, 138 mmol) was added to the above solution of2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-indan-1-one in165 ml of 2-methyltetrahydrofuran cooled to 5° C. Further on, 80 ml ofmethanol was added dropwise to this mixture for ca. 7 h at 5° C. Theresulting mixture was evaporated to dryness, 300 ml of dichloromethaneand 300 ml water were added to the residue, and thus obtained mixturewas acidified with 2 M HCl to pH˜6.5. The organic layer was separated;the aqueous layer was additionally extracted with 100 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined organic extract was passed through a pad(˜200 ml) of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent: dichloromethane). Theobtained elute was evaporated to dryness to give a slightly brownishoil. 200 mg of TsOH was added to a solution of thisoil in 200 ml oftoluene. This mixture was refluxed with Dean-Stark head for 10 min andthen cooled to room temperature using a water bath. The formed solutionwas washed with 10% Na₂CO₃, the organic layer was separated, and theaqueous layer was extracted with 50 ml of dichloromethane. The combinedorganic extract was dried over K₂CO₃ and then evaporated to dryness. Theresidue was dissolved in 100 ml of n-hexane, and the obtained solutionwas passed through a short pad (˜20 ml) of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm;eluent: n-hexane). The silica gel layer was additionally washed by 40 mlof n-hexane. The combined organic elute was evaporated to dryness, andthe resulting oil was dried in vacuum at elevated temperature to give15.35 g (95%) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene whichwas used in the following step without additional purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.20 (s, 1H), 7.08 (br.s, 1H), 6.98 (br.s, 1H), 6.42(m, 1H), 3.25 (s, 3H), 3.11 (s, 2H), 2.36 (s, 6H), 2.06 (s, 3H), 1.43(s, 9H). ¹³C NMR (CDCl₃): δ 154.20, 145.22, 141.78, 140.82, 140.64,138.30, 137.64, 131.80, 128.44, 127.18, 126.85, 116.98, 60.65, 42.80,35.12, 31.01, 21.41, 16.65.

Synthesisof 4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1, 2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene

Step 3 to 6 according to patent literature (e.g. WO2015158790).

Step 7:

200 ml (200 mmol, 1.4 eq) of 3,5-dimethylphenylmagnesium bromide 1.0 Min THF was added to a mixture of 2.0 g (2.56 mmol, 1.8 mol. %) ofNiCl₂(PPh₃)IPr and 40.0 g (142.3 mmol) of1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-bromo-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacene. Theresulting solution was refluxed for 3 h and then cooled to roomtemperature, and 400 ml of water followed by 500 ml of 1.0 M HClsolution were added. Then this mixture was extracted with 600 ml ofdichloromethane, the organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layerwas extracted with 2×100 ml of dichloromethane. The combined organicextract was evaporated to dryness to give a slightly greenish oil. Theproduct was isolated by flash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 um;eluent: hexanes-dichloromethane=2:1, vol., then 1:2, vol.). Thisprocedure gave 43.02 g (99%) of1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indaceneas a colorless thick oil as a mixture of two diastereoisomers.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃), Syn-isomer: δ 7.21 (s, 1H), 6.94 (br.s, 1H), 6.90 (br.s,2H), 4.48 (d, J=5.5 Hz, 1H), 3.43 (s, 3H), 2.94 (t, J=7.5 Hz, 2H),2.87-2.65 (m, 3H), 2.63-2.48 (m, 2H), 2.33 (s, 6H), 2.02 (quin, J=7.5Hz, 2H), 1.07 (d, J=6.7 Hz, 3H); Anti-isomer: δ 7.22 (s, 1H), 6.94(br.s, 1H), 6.89 (br.s, 2H), 4.38 (d, J=4.0 Hz, 1H), 3.48 (s, 3H), 3.06(dd, J=16.0 Hz, J=7.5 Hz, 1H), 2.93 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.75 (td, J=7.3Hz, J=3.2 Hz, 2H), 2.51-2.40 (m, 1H), 2.34 (s, 6H), 2.25 (dd, J=16.0 Hz,J=5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.01 (quin, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 1.11 (d, J=7.1 Hz, 3H).¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃), Syn-isomer: δ 142.69, 142.49, 141.43, 139.97,139.80, 137.40, 135.46, 128.34, 126.73, 120.09, 86.29, 56.76, 39.43,37.59, 33.11, 32.37, 25.92, 21.41, 13.73; Anti-isomer: δ 143.11, 142.72,140.76, 139.72, 139.16, 137.37, 135.43, 128.29, 126.60, 119.98,91.53,56.45, 40.06, 37.65, 33.03, 32.24, 25.88, 21.36, 19.36.

Step 8:

TsOH (200 mg) was added to the solution of 43.02 g (140.4 mmol) of1-methoxy-2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,2,3,5,6,7-hexahydro-s-indacenein 600 ml of toluene and the resulting solution was refluxed usingDean-Stark head for 15 min. After cooling to room temperature thereaction mixture was washed with 200 ml of 10% NaHCO₃. The organic layerwas separated, and the aqueous layer was additionally extracted with 300ml of dichloromethane. The combined organic extract was evaporated todryness to give light orange oil. The product was isolated byflash-chromatography on silica gel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent: hexanes, thenhexanes-dichloromethane=10:1, vol.). This procedure gave 35.66 g (93%)of 4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene as aslightly yellowish oil which spontaneously solidified to form a whitemass.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.09 (s, 1H), 6.98 (br.s, 2H), 6.96 (br.s, 1H), 6.44(m, 1H), 3.14 (s, 2H), 2.95 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H), 2.76 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 2H),2.35 (s, 6H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 2.02 (quin, J=7.3 Hz, 2H). ¹³C₁ ¹1-11 NMR(CDCl₃): δ 145.46, 144.71, 142.81, 140.17, 139.80, 137.81, 137.50,134.33, 128.35, 127.03, 126.48, 114.83, 42.00, 33.23, 32.00, 25.87,21.38, 16.74

Synthesisof MC-IE2

Step 9: a) ^(n)BuLi in ^(n)Bu₂O, −5° C.; b) 5 equiv Me2SiCl₂, THF, −30°C.

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 20.2 ml, 49.09 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene (15.69g, 48.96 mmol) in 250 ml of di-n-butyl ether cooled to −5° C. Theresulting mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, then theformed white suspension with a large amount of precipitate (which makeseffective stirring difficult) was cooled to −30° C., and THF (8 ml, 7.11g, i.e. ca. 2.01 ratio of THF to the starting indene was used) was addedto give a clear orange solution. This solution was cooled to −30° C.,and then dichlorodimethylsilane (31.6 g, 244.9 mmol, 5 equiv.) was addedin one portion. The obtained mixture was stirred overnight at roomtemperature and then filtered through a glass frit (G3). The filtratewas evaporated to dryness to give[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl]chlorodimethylsilaneas a slightly yellowish oil (containing some hard-to-remove impurity ofdi-n-butyl ether) which was used in the following step withoutadditional purification

Step 10: ^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 20.1 ml, 48.84 mmol) was added inone portion to a solution of4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene (13.43 g,48.94 mmol) in a mixture of di-n-butyl ether (200 mL) and THF (8 ml,7.11 g, i.e. ca. 2.02 ratio of THF to the starting indene) at −10° C.This mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature, giving an orangesuspension. To this suspension, a solution of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl]chlorodimethylsilane(as prepared above, ca. 48.96 mmol) in 120 ml of di-n-butyl ether wasadded in one portion. This mixture was stirred overnight at roomtemperature.

Step 11:

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 11.6 ml, 28.19 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 9.16 g (14.07 mol) of[6-tert-butyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-1H-inden-1-yl][4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilanein 190 ml of di-n-butyl ether cooled to −30° C. This mixture was stirredfor 4 h at room temperature, then the resulting ruby solution was cooledto −30° C. (some yellow precipitate formed), and then ZrCl₄ (3.28 g,14.08 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at roomtemperature to give light red solution with orange precipitate. Thisprecipitate was filtered off (G4) and then dried in vacuum to give 4.7 gof a mixture of syn-complex and LiCl (thus, the adjusted net weight ofsyn-complex was 3.51 g). The filtrate was evaporated until a viscous oilwas obtained, which was then triturated with 40 ml of n-hexane. Theobtained suspension was filtered through glass frit (G3), and the soobtained precipitate was dried under vacuum. This procedure gave 3.5 gof pure anti-zirconocene dichloride (D69) as a yellow powder. Yellowpowder precipitated from the solution overnight at −25° C. was collectedand dried under vacuum. This procedure gave 1.85 g of anti-zirconocenecontaminated with 5% of its syn-isomer. Thus, the total yield of syn-and anti-zirconocenes isolated in this synthesis was 8.86 g (78%).

Synthesisof MC-IE3

[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

To a solution of 7.87 g (24.56 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1H-indene in 150ml of ether, 10.1 ml (24.54 mmol) of 2.43 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes wasadded in one portion at −50° C. This mixture was stirred overnight atroom temperature, then the resulting yellow solution with a large amountof yellow precipitate was cooled to −50° C. (wherein the precipitatedisappeared completely), and 150 mg of CuCN was added. The obtainedmixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −25° C., then a solution of 9.70 g(24.55 mmol) of2-methyl-[4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl](chloro)dimethylsilanein 150 ml of ether was added in one portion. This mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature, then filtered through a pad of silica gel60 (40-63 μm), which was additionally washed with 2×50 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined filtrate was evaporated under reducedpressure, and the residue was dried in vacuum at elevated temperature.This procedure gave 16.2 g (97%) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(>95% purity by NMR, approx. 1:1 mixture of the stereoisomers) as ayellowish glassy solid which was further used without an additionalpurification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.49 (s, 0.5H), 7.47-7.42 (m, 2H), 7.37-7.32 (m,2.5H), 7.25 (s, 0.5H), 7.22 (s, 0.5H), 7.15-7.09 (m, 2H), 7.01-6.97 (m,1H), 6.57, 6.56 and 6.45 (3s, sum 2H), 3.70, 3.69, 3.67 and 3.65 (4s,sum 2H), 3.28 and 3.27 (2s, sum 3H), 3.01-2.79 (m, 4H), 2.38 (s, 6H),2.19, 2.16 and 2.13 (3s, sum 6H), 2.07-2.00 (m, 2H), 1.43 and 1.41 (2s,sum 9H), 1.38 (s, 9H), −0.18, −0.19, −0.20 and −0.23 (4s, sum 6H).¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): 155.30, 155.27, 149.14, 149.10, 147.45, 147.38,146.01, 145.77, 143.98, 143.92, 143.73, 143.68, 142.13, 142.09, 139.51,139.41, 139.26, 139.23, 139.19, 139.15, 138.22, 137.51, 137.08, 137.05,136.98, 130.05, 130.01, 129.11, 128.22, 127.90, 127.48, 127.44, 126.18,126.13, 125.97, 125.92, 124.82, 120.55, 120.49, 118.50, 118.27, 60.54,60.50, 47.34, 47.33, 46.87, 46.72, 35.14, 34.54, 33.34, 33.28, 32.30,31.44, 31.25, 31.20, 26.02, 26.01, 21.45, 17.95, 17.87.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride

To a solution of 16.2 g (23.86 mmol) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(prepared above) in 250 ml of ether, cooled to −50° C., 19.7 ml (47.87mmol) of 2.43 M ^(n)BuLi in hexanes was added in one portion. Thismixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature, then the resulting redsolution was cooled to −50° C., and 5.57 g (23.9 mmol) of ZrCl₄ wasadded. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature togive red solution with orange precipitate. This mixture was evaporatedto dryness. The residue was treated with 150 ml of hot toluene, and theformed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4). The filtrate wasevaporated to 50 ml, and then 20 ml of n-hexane was added. The orangecrystals precipitated from this solution overnight at room temperaturewere collected, washed with 10 ml of cold toluene, and dried in vacuum.This procedure gave 5.02 g (25%) of anti-zirconocene as a solvate withtoluene (×0.75 toluene). The mother liquor was evaporated to ca. 30 ml,and 30 ml of n-hexane was added. The orange powder precipitated fromthis solution overnight at room temperature was collected and dried invacuum. This procedure gave 6.89 g (34%) of a ca. 3 to 7 mixture ofanti- and syn-zirconocenes. Thus, the total yield of rac-zirconoceneisolated in this synthesis was 11.91 g (60%).

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride.

Anal. calc. for C₄₈H₅₆Cl₂OsiZr×0.75C₇H₈: C, 70.42; H, 6.88. Found: C,70.51; H, 6.99.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.63-7.03 (very br.s, 2H), 7.59-7.51 (br.m, 2H),7.51-7.42 (m, 4H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.78 (s, 1H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 3.46 (s,3H), 3.11-3.04 (m, 1H), 3.04-2.93 (m, 2H), 2.88-2.81 (m, 1H), 2.36 (s,6H), 2.22 (s, 3H), 2.21 (s, 3H), 2.12-1.94 (m, 2H), 1.41 (s, 9H), 1.36(s, 9H), 1.32 (s, 3H), 1.31 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl_(3,)): 8159.78,149.90, 144.67, 144.07, 143.07, 136.75, 135.44, 135.40, 133.97, 133.51,132.90, 132.23, 128.84, 128.76, 127.34, 127.01, 126.73, 125.28, 125.17,122.89, 121.68, 121.59, 120.84, 117.94, 81.60, 81.26, 62.61, 35.73,34.60, 33.20, 32.17, 31.36, 30.34, 26.56, 21.40, 18.41, 18.26, 2.65,2.54.

Synthesisof MC-IE4

Chloro[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 16.9 ml, 41.07 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 12.43 g (41.1 mmol) of4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene in 200 mlof ether cooled to −50° C. The resulting mixture was stirred overnightat room temperature; the resulting yellow slurry (light orange solutionwith a large amount of yellow precipitate) was then cooled to −50° C.,during the cooling the precipitate completely dissolved to form anorange solution, and 26.5 g (205 mmol, 5 equiv.) ofdichlorodimethylsilane was added in one portion. The obtained solutionwas stirred overnight at room temperature and then filtered through aglass frit (G3), the flask and the filter cake were rinsed with 50 ml oftoluene. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness to give 16 g (99%) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilaneas slightly yellowish oil which was used without further purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.47-7.41 (m, 2H), 7.34-7.27 (m, 3H), 6.56 (s, 1H),3.56 (s, 1H), 3.05-2.78 (m, 4H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.04 (quin, J=7.4 Hz,2H), 1.38 (s, 9H), 0.44 (s, 3H), 0.18 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ149.27, 144.42, 142.14, 141.40, 139.94, 139.83, 136.84, 130.18, 129.07,126.87, 124.86, 118.67, 49.76, 34.55, 33.26, 32.31, 31.43, 26.00, 17.60,1.17, −0.60

[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 13.8 ml, 33.53 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 13.55 g (33.49 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-indene in200 ml of ether at −50° C. This mixture was stirred for 5 h at roomtemperature; the resulting orange slurry with a large amount of yellowprecipitate was then cooled to −50° C., and 150 mg of CuCN was added.The obtained mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −25° C., then a solutionof 13.23 g (33.49 mmol) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilanein 150 ml of ether was added in one portion. This mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature, then filtered through a pad of silica gel60 (40-63 μm), which was additionally washed with 2×50 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined filtrate was evaporated under reducedpressure, and the product was isolated by flash-chromatography on silicagel 60 (40-63 μm; eluent: hexanes-dichloromethane=10:1, then 3:1 vol).This procedure gave 18.4 g (72%) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-methyl-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(>95% purity by NMR, approx. 1:1 mixture of stereoisomers) as yellowishglass which was used without further purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.52-7.40 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.30 (m, 4H), 7.27 (s, 1H),7.22 (s, 1H), 6.57, 6.52 and 6.51 (3s, sum 2H), 3.71, 3.69 and 3.66 (3s,sum 2H), 3.20 and 3.19 (2s, sum 3H), 3.02-2.77 (m, 4H), 2.20, 2.18 and2.16 (3s, sum 6H), 2.09-1.97 (m, 2H), 1.43 and 1.42 (2s, sum 9H), 1.38and 1.37 (2s, sum 27H), −0.18, −0.19 and −0.23 (3s, sum 6H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl₃): δ 155.49, 150.23, 149.15, 149.11, 147.36, 147.29, 146.04,145.83, 143.99, 143.70, 142.15, 142.10, 139.53, 139.42, 139.24, 139.18,139.13, 137.21, 137.17, 137.10, 130.07, 130.02, 129.13, 128.06, 126.18,124.82, 124.72, 120.46, 120.40, 119.84, 118.54, 118.31, 60.08, 47.29,46.92, 46.80, 35.17, 34.86, 34.54, 33.31, 32.31, 31.57, 31.46, 31.23,31.19, 26.01, 18.08, 18.04, 17.99, 17.88, −5.30, −5.57, −5.62, −5.84.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride MC-IE4

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 19.9 ml, 48.36 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 18.4 g (24.11 mmol) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(as prepared above) in 200 ml of ether cooled to −60° C. This mixturewas stirred overnight at room temperature; the resulting orange slurrywas then cooled to −60° C. and 5.62 g (24.12 mmol) of ZrCl₄ was added.The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature to give ared solution with a small amount of precipitate. This mixture wasevaporated to dryness. The residue was heated with 150 ml of toluene,and the formed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4). Thefiltrate was evaporated to 80 ml, and then 20 ml of n-pentane was added.Orange powder precipitated from this solution overnight at roomtemperature was collected and dried in vacuum. This procedure gave 6.02g (27%) of syn-zirconocene as a solvate with toluene (×1 PhMe)contaminated with ca. 2% of anti-isomer. The mother liquor wasevaporated to ca. 30 ml, and 30 ml of n-hexane was added. Orange powderprecipitated from this solution overnight at room temperature wascollected and dried under vacuum. This procedure gave 1.38 g (6%) ofsyn-zirconocene as a solvate with toluene (×1 PhMe) contaminated withca. 8% of anti-isomer. The mother liquor was evaporated to the oilystate, and thisoil was dissolved in 50 ml of n-hexane. Yellow powderprecipitated from this solution over 2 days at −30° C. was collected anddried in vacuum. This procedure gave 7.3 g (33%) of anti-zirconocenecontaminated with ca. 3% of syn-isomer. Thus, the total yield of anti-and syn-zirconocenes isolated in this synthesis was 14.7 g (66%).

7.3 g (33%) of anti-zirconocene contaminated with ca. 3% of syn-isomerwas additionally recrystallized from a hot mixture of 15 ml of tolueneand 30 ml of n-hexane. Light-orange crystals precipitated overnight atroom temperature were collected and dried under vacuum. This proceduregave 4.6 g of pure anti-zirconocene as a solvate with toluene (×0.8PhMe).

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride

Anal. calc. for C₅₄H₆₈Cl₂OSiZr×0.8C₇H₈: C, 71.80; H, 7.52. Found: C,72.04; H, 7.75.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.60-7.30 (set of signals, sum 9H), 6.73 (s, 1H), 6.60(s, 1H), 3.33 (s, 3H), 3.16-3.02 (m, 1H), 3.02-2.88 (m, 2H), 2.88-2.77(m, 1H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.11-1.91 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H),1.34 (s, 9H), 1.33 (s, 18H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR(CDCl_(3,)): δ 160.02, 149.90, 144.69, 143.96, 143.05, 135.95, 135.51,135.40, 133.99, 133.72, 132.85, 132.16, 128.80, 127.54, 126.97, 125.16,124.25, 122.74, 121.76, 121.12, 120.68, 120.45, 117.96, 81.85, 81.23,62.26, 35.77, 34.96, 34.61, 33.18, 32.14, 31.56, 31.38, 30.32, 26.53,18.39 (two resonances), 2.66, 2.61.

Synthesis of MC-IE5

Chloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 12.6 ml, 30.62 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 8.4 g (30.61 mmol) of4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene in amixture of 150 ml of ether and 10 ml of THF cooled to −50° C. Theresulting mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature; theobtained red solution was then cooled to −50° C., and 19.8 g (153.4mmol, 5.01 equiv.) of dichlorodimethylsilane was added in one portion.This mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature and then filteredthrough a glass frit (G3), the flask and the filter cake were rinsedwith 50 ml of toluene. The filtrate was evaporated to dryness to give11.3 g (ca. 100%) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilaneas reddish oil which was used without further purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.29 (s, 1H), 6.97 (s, 3H), 6.50 (m, 1H), 3.55 (s,1H), 3.06-2.72 (m, 4H), 2.37 (s, 6H), 2.20 (s, 3H), 2.04 (quin, J=7.4Hz, 2H), 0.43 (s, 3H), 0.19 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 144.39,142.06, 141.36, 139.81, 139.78, 137.40, 130.49, 128.24, 127.20, 126.80,118.65, 49.74, 33.25, 32.20, 25.93, 21.43, 17.63, 1.16, −0.53

[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 12.6 ml, 30.62 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 12.39 g (30.62 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-indene in200 ml of ether at −50° C. This mixture was stirred overnight at roomtemperature; the resulting yellow slurry was then cooled to −50° C., and150 mg of CuCN was added. The obtained mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at−25° C., then a solution of 11.3 g (30.61 mmol) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(as prepared above) in 150 ml of ether was added in one portion. Thismixture was stirred for 20 h at room temperature, then filtered througha pad of silica gel 60 (40-63 μm) which was additionally washed by 2×50ml of dichloromethane. The combined filtrate was evaporated underreduced pressure to give 22.34 g (99%) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilaneas orange glass which was used without further purification.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride MC-IE5

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 25 ml, 60.75 mmol) was added in one portionto a solution of 22.34 g (30.39 mmol) of[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(as prepared above) in 250 ml of ether cooled to −50° C. This mixturewas stirred overnight at room temperature, then the resulting dark-redsolution was cooled to −60° C., and 7.09 g (30.43 mmol) of ZrCl₄ wasadded. The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature togive orange slurry (red solution with yellow precipitate). This mixturewas evaporated to dryness. The residue was heated with 150 ml oftoluene, and the formed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4).The filtrate was evaporated to 60 ml, and the obtained suspension washeated to get a clear solution. Yellow powder precipitated from thissolution over 30 min at room temperature was collected and dried undervacuum. This procedure gave 3.7 g of pure anti-zirconocene. Yellowpowder precipitated from the mother liquor overnight at room temperaturewas collected and dried under vacuum. This procedure gave 10.1 g of aca. 40 to 60 mixture of anti- and syn-zirconocenes. The mother liquorwas evaporated to dryness and triturated with 10 ml of n-hexane. Thisprocedure gave 3.38 g of a ca. 40 to 60 mixture of anti- andsyn-zirconocenes. Thus, the total yield of anti- and syn-zirconocenesisolated in this synthesis was 17.18 g (63%).

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride

Anal. calc. for C₅₂H₆₄Cl₂OSiZr: C, 69.76; H, 7.21. Found: C, 69.93; H,7.49.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.75-7.01 (4 very br.s, sum 4H), 7.49 (s, 1H), 7.40(s, 1H), 7.34 (t, J=1.8 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (m, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 6.57 (s,1H), 3.30 (s, 3H), 3.09-3.01 (m, 1H), 2.98-2.90 (m, 2H), 2.86-2.79 (m,1H), 2.32 (s, 6H), 2.18 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 2.08-1.94 (m, 2H), 1.38(s, 9H), 1.32 (s, 18H), 1.29 (s,3H), 1.28 (s, 3H). NMR (CDCl_(3,)): δ159.85, 150.41 (broad s), 144.69, 143.92, 142.96, 138.30, 137.59 (broads), 135.87, 135.35, 134.02, 133.57, 132.73, 132.42, 128.79, 127.55,127.10, 126.97 (broad s), 124.41 (broad s), 122.83, 122.14, 121.24,120.65, 120.38, 117.94, 81.87, 81.03, 62.25, 35.77, 34.98, 33.18, 31.99,31.49, 30.37, 26.43, 21.31, 18.44, 18.37, 2.66, 2.63.

Synthesisof MC-IE6

Chloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 15.0 ml, 36.45 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 13.07 g (36.45 mmol) of4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-6-methyl-1,2,3,5-tetrahydro-s-indacene in200 ml of ether cooled to −50° C. The resulting mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature; the so obtained light-orange solutioncontaining a large amount of white precipitate was then cooled to −60°C. and 23.5 g (182.1 mmol, 5 equiv.) of dichlorodimethylsilane was addedin one portion. This mixture was stirred overnight at room temperatureand then filtered through a glass frit (G3), the flask and the filtercake were rinsed with 50 ml of toluene. The filtrate was evaporated todryness to give 16.6 g (ca. 100%) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilaneas yellowish oil which was used without further purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.30 (s, 1H), 7.23 (s, 2H), 6.58 (s,1H), 3.57 (s, 1H), 3.05-2.93 (m, 2H), 2.93-2.83 (m, 2H), 2.21 (s, 3H),2.10-2.01 (m, 2H), 1.36 (s, 18H), 0.45 (s, 3H), 0.20 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H}NMR (CDCl₃): δ 150.02, 144.42, 142.12, 141.53, 139.93, 139.91, 138.77,131.40, 127.00, 123.93, 120.15, 118.63, 49.77, 34.88, 33.31, 32.50,31.56, 26.03, 17.71, 1.25, −0.53.

[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 15.0 ml, 36.45 mmol) was added in oneportion to a solution of 12.7 g (36.44 mmol) of2-methyl-5-tert-butyl-6-methoxy-7-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1H-indene in 200ml of ether at −50° C. This mixture was stirred overnight at roomtemperature, then the resulting yellowish slurry with a large amount ofprecipitate was cooled to −40° C. and 100 mg of CuCN was added. Theobtained mixture was stirred for 0.5 h at −25° C., then a solution of16.6 g (ca. 36.45 mmol) ofchloro[2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilanein 150 ml of ether was added in one portion. This mixture was stirredovernight at room temperature, then filtered through a pad of silica gel60 (40-63 nm) which was additionally washed with 2×50 ml ofdichloromethane. The combined filtrate was evaporated under reducedpressure, and the residue was dried in vacuum at elevated temperature.This procedure gave 27.78 g (ca. 100%) of[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(ca. 95% purity by NMR, approx. 1:1 mixture of stereoisomers) asyellowish glass which was used without further purification.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.54-7.20 (set of signals, sum 9H), 6.59 (s, 1H), 6.51(s, 1H), 3.74, 3.69, 3.68 and 3.67 (4s, sum 2H), 3.23 and 3.22 (2s, sum3H), 3.05-2.83 (m, 4H), 2.22 and 2.16 (2s, sum 6H), 2.11-1.99 (m, 2H),1.44 and 1.41 (2s, sum 9H), 1.39 and 1.37 (2s, sum 27H), -0.18,-0.19 and-0.22 (3s, sum 6H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl₃): δ 155.52, 149.97, 149.95,149.43, 147.47, 146.01, 145.79, 144.10, 144.06, 143.79, 143.75, 142.15,142.11, 139.65, 139.53, 139.40, 139.32, 139.18, 139.15, 139.04, 139.00,137.14, 137.09, 135.26, 131.29, 129.77, 127.29, 127.27, 126.34, 126.27,126.00, 125.05, 124.01, 120.62, 120.55, 120.04, 120.01, 118.49, 118.25,60.52, 60.48, 47.42, 47.35, 46.92, 46.72, 35.17, 34.89, 34.57, 33.40,33.35, 32.49, 31.58, 31.50, 31.28, 31.23, 26.04, 26.02, 18.09, 17.97.

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconium dichloride MC-IE-6

^(n)BuLi in hexanes (2.43 M, 30 ml, 72.9 mmol) was added in one portionto a solution of 27.78 g (36.4 mmol) of[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl-1H-inden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilane(as prepared above) in 300 ml of ether cooled to −50° C. This mixturewas stirred overnight at room temperature; the resulting red solutionwas then cooled to −50° C. and 8.49 g (36.43 mmol) of ZrCl₄ was added.The reaction mixture was stirred for 24 h at room temperature to give anorange slurry (red solution with orange precipitate). This mixture wasevaporated to dryness. The residue was heated with 150 ml of toluene,and the formed suspension was filtered through glass frit (G4). Thefiltrate was evaporated to 80 ml and heated to get a clear solution.Light-red crystals precipitated from this solution overnight at roomtemperature were collected and dried under vacuum. This procedure gave8.3 g of syn-zirconocene as a solvate with toluene (×1 PhMe)contaminated with ca. 2% of anti-isomer. The mother liquor wasevaporated to ca. 60 ml, 15 ml of n-hexane was added, and the resultingmixture was heated to get a clear solution. Yellow crystals precipitatedfrom this solution overnight at room temperature were collected anddried in vacuum. This procedure gave 6.1 g of anti-zirconocenecontaminated with ca. 2% of syn-isomer. The mother liquor was evaporatedto ca. 30 ml, the resulting suspension was heated to ca. 100° C. and wasfiltered while hot via glass frit (G3). The obtained solid was driedunder vacuum to give 2.4 g of anti-zirconocene contaminated with lessthan 1% of syn-isomer. The mother liquor was evaporated to dryness, andthe obtained residue was recrystallized from a mixture of 20 ml oftoluene and 5 ml of n-hexane to give 8.4 g of a ca. 28 to 72 mixture ofanti- and syn-zirconocenes. Thus, the total yield of anti- andsyn-zirconocenes isolated in this synthesis was 25.2 g (75%).

Anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3,5-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5,6,7-trihydro-s-indacen-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride:

Anal. calc. for C₅₄H₆₈Cl₂OSiZr: C, 70.24; H, 7.42. Found: C, 70.52; H,7.70.

¹H NMR (CDCl₃): δ 7.61-7.30 (set of signals, sum 9H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 6.56(s, 1H), 3.38 (s, 3H), 3.12-3.01 (m, 1H), 3.01-2.88 (m, 2H), 2.88-2.76(m, 1H), 2.19 (s, 3H), 2.17 (s, 3H), 2.12-1.88 (m, 2H), 1.38 (s, 9H),1.34 (s, 27H), 1.29 (s, 3H), 1.28 (s, 3H). ¹³C{¹H} NMR (CDCl_(3,)): δ159.92, 150.25, 150.00, 144.60, 143.92, 143.11, 137.55, 135.17, 134.00,133.83, 133.76, 133.39, 133.21, 129.29, 126.92, 126.77, 125.31, 123.68,123.09, 121.36, 121.21, 120.82, 117.84, 81.87, 81.42, 62.71, 35.74,35.00, 34.62, 33.27, 32.45, 31.58, 31.42, 30.42, 26.64, 18.46, 18.29,2.73, 2.60.

Synthesisof Comparative Metallocene MC-CE1

MC-CE1 (rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl(2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)inden-1-yl)(2-methyl-4-(4′-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl) zirconium dichloride) was synthetized according to theprocedure as decribed in WO WO2013007650, E7.

Synthesisof comparative metallocene MC-CE2

MC-CE2 (rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl(2-methyl-4-(4′-tert-butylphenyl)inden-1-yl)(2-methyl-4-phenyl-5-methoxy-6-tert-butyl inden-1-yl)zirconium dichloride) was synthetized according to the procedure asdecribed in WO WO2013007650, E2.

Synthesisof Comparative Metallocene MC-CE3

MC-CE3 (rac-dimethylsilanediylbis[2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenypindenyl]zirconium dichloride) was synthetized according to the procedure asdescribed in WO98040331, example 65.

Synthesisof Comparative Metallocene MC-CE4

MC-CE4 (rac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3′,5′-di-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3′,5′-di-tert-butylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tert-butylinden-1-yl]zirconiumdichloride) was synthetized according to the procedure as described inWO2015158790, example C₂—Zr.

Synthesisof Comparative Metallocene MC-CE5

MC-CE5(rac-μ-{bis-[η⁵-2-methyl-4-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl]dimethylsilanediyl}dichlorozirconium)was prepared as described in WO2006/097497A1. The 1H NMR spectrum of itcorresponds to that reported in the mentioned patent application.

Comparative metallocene MC-CE6 and comparative metallocene MC-CE7 aremade analogously.

Summary of Examples

NON SUPPORTED CATALYST PREPARATION EXAMPLES

Materials

Inventive metallocenes MC-IE1, MC-IE2, MC-IE3, MC-IE4, MC-IE5 and MC-IE6and comparative metallocenes MC-CE1, MC-CE2, MC-CE3, MC-CE4, MC-CES,MC-CE6 and MC-CE7 as described above were used in preparing catalysts.MAO was used as a 30 wt-% solution in toluene . Trityltetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (Boulder Chemicals) was used aspurchased. As surfactants were used perfluoroalkylethyl acrylate esters(CAS number 65605-70-1) purchased from the Cytonix corporation, driedover activated molecular sieves (2 times) and degassed by argon bubblingprior to use (S1) or 1H,1H-Perfluoro(2-methyl-3-oxahexan-1-ol) (CAS26537-88-2) purchased from Unimatec, dried over activated molecularsieves (2 times) and degassed by argon bubbling prior to use (S2).Hexadecafluoro-1,3-dimethylyclohexane (PFC) (CAS number 335-27-3) wasobtained from commercial sources and dried over activated molecularsieves (2 times) and degassed by argon bubbling prior to use. Propyleneis provided by Borealis and adequately purified before use.Triethylaluminum was purchased from Crompton and used in pure form.Hydrogen is provided by AGA and purified before use.

All the chemicals and chemical reactions were handled under an inert gasatmosphere using Schlenk and glovebox techniques, with oven-driedglassware, syringes, needles or cannulas.

Catalyst Example IE1

Inside the glovebox, 85.9 mg of dry and degassed surfactant S2 was mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 43.9 mg MC-IE1 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) was dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(450 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turnedoff. The catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow. 0.62 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Catalyst Example IE-2

Inside the glovebox, 86.2 mg of dry and degassed surfactant S2 was mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 41.1 mg MC-IE2 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) was dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(450 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turnedoff. The catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow. 0.54 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Catalyst Example IE-3

Inside the glovebox, 85.3 mg of dry and degassed surfactant S2 was mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 42.4 mg MC-IE-3 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(450 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turnedoff. The catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow. 0.52 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Catalyst Example IE-3.1b

Inside the glovebox, 234.3 mg of S2 surfactant solution (14 wt % intoluene) was added dropwise to 5 mL of 30 wt.-% MAO. The solutions wereleft under stirring for 30 min. Then, around 95.6 mg of metalloceneMC-IE3 (0.114 mmol, 1 equivalent) was added to MAO/surfactant solutionand the solution was stirred for 60 minutes. Then 104.9 mg of trityltetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate was added. The mixture was left toreact at room temperature inside the glovebox for 60 minutes.

Then, 5 mL of catalyst solution were added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). A red emulsion formedimmediately and stirred during 15 minutes at −10° C./600rpm. Then theemulsion was transferred via a 2/4 Teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at90° C. and stirred at 600rpm until the transfer is completed. Then thespeed was reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bathwas removed and the stirrer turned off. The catalyst was left to settleup on top of the PFC and after 35 minutes the solvent was siphoned off.The remaining red catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over anargon flow. 0.70 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

Catalyst Example 1E4

Inside the glovebox, S2 surfactant solution (27.6 mg of dry and degassedS2 dilute in 0.2 mL toluene) was added dropwise to 5 mL of 30 wt.-% MAO.The solution was left under stirring for 10 min. Then, around 46.7 mg ofmetallocene was added to 5 ml MAO/surfactant solution and the solutionwas stirred for 60 minutes Then, the MAO/MC-IE-4/S2 solution (5.2 mL)was added into a 50 mL emulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL ofPFC at −10° C. and equipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600rpm). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during 15 minutes at−10° C./600rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4 Teflon tubeto 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C. and stirred at 600rpm until the transferis completed. Then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutesstirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turned off. Thecatalyst was left to settle on top of the PFC and after 35 minutes, thesolvent was siphoned off. The remaining nice red catalyst was driedduring 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow.

Comparative Catalyst example CE-1

Inside the glovebox, 80 μl of dry and degassed surfactant Slwas mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 66.3 mg MC-CE1(0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) was dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox. After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocenesolution and 1 mL of the surfactant solution were successively addedinto a 50 mL emulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at−10° C. and equipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm).Total amount of MAO is 5 mL (300 equivalents). A red emulsion formedimmediately and stirred during 15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then theemulsion was transferred via a 2/4 teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm until the transfer is completed, then thespeed was reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bathwas removed and the stirrer turned off The catalyst was left to settleup on top of the PFC and after 45 minutes the solvent was siphoned off.The remaining red catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over anargon flow. 0.31 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst example CE-1b (Same Metallocene as ComparativeExample CE-1)

Inside the glovebox, 85.6 mg of dry and degassed S2 were mixed with 2 mLof MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. The followingday, 44.2 mg of MC-CE1 (0.051 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolved with 4mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stir insidethe glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 1 mL of the surfactant solution and the 4 mL of theMAO-metallocene solution were successively added into a 50 mLemulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. andequipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amountof MAO is 5 mL (300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately andstirred during 15 minutes at −10° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion wastransferred via a 2/4 teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., andstirred at 600 rpm until the transfer is completed, and then the speedwas reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bath wasremoved and the stirrer turned off. The catalyst was left to settle upon top of the PFC and after 35 minutes the solvent was siphoned off Theremaining catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argonflow. 0.75 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-2

Inside the glovebox, 80 μl of dry and degassed surfactant Slwas mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 58.7 mg MC-CE2 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turned offThe catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow. 0.52 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-3

Inside the glovebox, 80 μl of dry and degassed surfactant Si was mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 56.2 mg MC-CE3 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) was dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turned offThe catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argon flow. 0.56 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-4

Inside the glovebox, 80 μl of dry and degassed surfactant S1was mixedwith 2 mL of MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. Thefollowing day, 73.0 mg MC-CE4 (0.076 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolvedwith 4 mL of the MAO solution in another septum bottle and left to stirinside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 4 mL of the MAO-metallocene solution and 1 mL of thesurfactant solution were successively added into a 50 mL emulsificationglass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. and equipped with anoverhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amount of MAO is 5 mL(300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately and stirred during15 minutes at 0° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion was transferred via a 2/4teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., and stirred at 600 rpm untilthe transfer is completed, then the speed was reduced to 300 rpm. After15 minutes stirring, the oil bath was removed and the stirrer turned offThe catalyst was left to settle up on top of the PFC and after 45minutes the solvent was siphoned off. The remaining red catalyst wasdried during 2 hours at 50° C. under an argon flow. 0.50 g of a red freeflowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-5

Inside the glovebox, 85.7 mg of dry and degassed S2 were mixed with 2 mLof MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. The followingday, 38.0 mg of MC-CE5 (0.051 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolved with 4mL of MAO in another septum bottle and left to stir inside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 1 mL of the surfactant solution and the 4 mL of theMAO-metallocene solution were successively added into a 50 mLemulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. andequipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amountof MAO is 5 mL (300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately andstirred during 15 minutes at −10° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion wastransferred via a 2/4 teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., andstirred at 600 rpm until the transfer is completed, and then the speedwas reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bath wasremoved and the stirrer turned off. The catalyst was left to settle upon top of the PFC and after 35 minutes the solvent was siphoned off Theremaining catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argonflow. 0.66 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-6

Inside the glovebox, 85.7 mg of dry and degassed S2 were mixed with 2 mLof MAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. The followingday, 58.1 mg of MC-CE6 (0.051 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolved with 4mL of MAO in another septum bottle and left to stir inside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 1 mL of the surfactant solution and the 4 mL of theMAO-metallocene solution were successively added into a 50 mLemulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. andequipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amountof MAO is 5 mL (300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately andstirred during 15 minutes at −10° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion wastransferred via a 2/4 teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., andstirred at 600 rpm until the transfer is completed, and then the speedwas reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bath wasremoved and the stirrer turned off. The catalyst was left to settle upon top of the PFC and after 35 minutes the solvent was siphoned off Theremaining catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argonflow. 0.60 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

Comparative Catalyst Example CE-7

Inside the glovebox, 72.0 mg of dry and degassed S2 were mixed with 2 mLMAO in a septum bottle and left to react overnight. The following day,39.8 mg of MC-CE7 (0.051 mmol, 1 equivalent) were dissolved with 4 mL ofMAO in another septum bottle and left to stir inside the glovebox.

After 60 minutes, 1 mL of the surfactant solution and the 4 mL of theMAO-metallocene solution were successively added into a 50 mLemulsification glass reactor containing 40 mL of PFC at −10° C. andequipped with an overhead stirrer (stirring speed=600 rpm). Total amountof MAO is 5 mL (300 equivalents). A red emulsion formed immediately andstirred during 15 minutes at −10° C./600 rpm. Then the emulsion wastransferred via a 2/4 teflon tube to 100 mL of hot PFC at 90° C., andstirred at 600 rpm until the transfer is completed, and then the speedwas reduced to 300 rpm. After 15 minutes stirring, the oil bath wasremoved and the stirrer turned off. The catalyst was left to settle upon top of the PFC and after 35 minutes the solvent was siphoned off Theremaining catalyst was dried during 2 hours at 50° C. over an argonflow. 0.72 g of a red free flowing powder was obtained.

TABLE 1 Catalyst synthesis summary and elemental analysis Cat ICP ZrMetallocene Ex (wt.-%) Al/Zr (mol/mol) MC-IE1 IE1 0.27 453 MC-IE2 IE20.26 479 MC-IE3 IE3 0.26 481 MC-IE3 IE3b 0.50 215 MC-IE4 IE4 0.26 479MC-CE1 CE1 0.35 291 MC-CE1 CE1b 0.31 421 MC-CE2 CE2* 0.41 283 MC-CE3 CE30.40 294 MC-CE4 CE4 0.33 335 MC-CE5 CE5 0.28 474 MC-CE6 CE6 0.37 346MC-CE7 CE7 0.28 423 *CE2 Zr content (ICP) was re-measured overWO2013/007650 (E2).

Silica Supported Catalyst Examples

The silica-MAO catalysts have been prepared on 30₁1 SUNSPERA DM-L-303silica produced by AGC Si-Tech Co, previously calcined at 600° C. for 2hours in an Electric Muffle Furnace under a flow of dry air.

Preparation of Silica Supported Metallocene Catalyst (Silica-IE1)

Step-1

Toluene was dried over molecular sieves and degassed by bubbling withargon for at least 30 minutes.

Inside the glovebox, 6.3 g of the calcined silica was charged into around-bottom flask equipped with an overhead stirrer and a sealedseptum, and then −30 mL of dry and degassed toluene was added into it.The resulting suspension was cooled down to 0° C. under mild stirring(200-300 rpm) and 16 mL of MAO solution added dropwise.

After around 20 minutes, the cooling bath was removed and stirring wascontinued for 2 hours. The silica-MAO slurry was allowed to settle andthen the supernatant toluene solution was siphoned off via a 2/4 teflontube. Then, around 20 mL of dried and degassed toluene was added and theslurry was stirred for 15 minutes at room temperature.

The flask was placed into the oil bath and warmed up to 80° C. and theslurry solution was stirred for additional 30 min. Then the silica-MAOslurry was again allowed to settle for 10 min. The hot toluene solutionwas siphoned off

This washing procedure was repeated one more time, and then anadditional washing has been performed using toluene (20 ml pentane,stirring 15 min). The toluene layer was siphoned off, then the solid wasdried under argon flow at room temperature for about 3 h. The whiteflowing MAO-silica powder was collected and used for supported catalystpreparation Silica-TEL

Step-2

Inside the glove box, 0.25 mL of MAO solution was added to MC-IE1solution (30 mg of MC-IE1 in 1 ml of toluene) in a septum bottle.

1 g of dry silica-MAO powder was placed into a 20 mL glass vial, andthen −5 mL of dry and degassed toluene was added into it. Then thecomplex solution was added and the slurry solution was stirred for 60minutes at room temperature and the resulting slurry was allowed tostand overnight in the glove box. Then 5 mL of dried and degassedtoluene was added; the bath temperature was set to 40° C. and stirredfor 60 minutes. The solid catalyst was allowed to settle, and then thetoluene layer was removed. Then another 5 mL of dried and degassedtoluene was added; the bath temperature was set to 60° C. and stirredfor 2 hours minutes. The solid catalyst was allowed to settle, and thenthe toluene layer was removed. Then three additional washing step hasbeen performed at room temperature using 5 ml of dry toluene and thetoluene layer was siphoned off and then the solid was dried under argonflow at room temperature for 3 h. 0.967 g of a red silica supportedflowing powder was collected.

Preparation of Silica Supported Metallocene Catalyst (Silica-IE2)

Step 1

Toluene was dried over molecular sieves and degassed by bubbling withargon for at least 30 minutes. Inside the glovebox, 10 g of the calcinedsilica was charged into a round-bottom flask equipped with an overheadstirrer and a sealed septum, then −50 mL of dry and degassed toluene wasadded into it. The resulting suspension was cooled down to 0° C. undermild stirring (200—300 rpm) by means of a cooling bath. 25 mL of a 30wt-% MAO solution in toluene was slowly added with a dry and degassedsyringe or by siphonation onto the silica suspension (dropwise, addingtime˜1 h). Then the cooling bath was removed and stirring was continuedfor 2 hours. The silica-MAO slurry was allowed to settle and then thesupernatant toluene solution was siphoned off with an oven-driedcannula.

˜30 mL of dried and degassed toluene was added, the slurry was stirredfor 15 minutes at room temperature, then the flask was placed into theoil bath and warmed up to 80° C. Stirring was continued for additional15 min, then the slurry was again allowed to settle for 10 min. The hottoluene solution was siphoned off from the top of the settled silica-MAOlayer. This washing procedure was repeated one more time, and then anadditional washing has been performed using pentane (30 ml pentane,stirring 15 min, settling 10min). The pentane layer was siphoned off,then the solid was dried under argon flow at room temperature (20-25°C.) for about 3 h and finally the flask was placed in a water bath (+50°C.) and the last residues of solvent were removed under argon flowthrough silica-MAO solid layer. During the final drying steps thesilica-MAO solid turned into an easily flowing powder.

This MAO-silica activated carrier was used to prepare catalystSilica-IE2 (and to prepare Silica-CE1, and Silica-CE2).

Step 2

Preparation of complex solution. Inside a glove box, 0.25 mL of thetoluene-MAO solution was added to a solution of 23 mg ofrac-anti-dimethylsilanediyl[2-methyl-4-(3′5′-dimethylphenyl)-1,5,6,7-tetrahydro-s-indacen-1-yl][2-methyl-4-(3′5′-dimethylphenyl)-5-methoxy-6-tertbutylinden-1-yl]zirconiumdichloridemetallocene (MC-IE2) in 1 ml of toluene in a septum bottle.

1 g of the previously prepared silica-MAO dry powder was placed into a20 mL glass vial, and the complex solution was added. The resultingslurry was allowed to stand overnight in the glove box. 5 mL of driedand degassed toluene was added; the bath temperature was set to 60° C.and stirred for 30 minutes. The solid catalyst was allowed to settle,and then the toluene layer was removed by syringe. The washing step wasrepeated twice more (2×5 mL toluene). The solid was allowed to cool downto room temperature and one final washing step was carried out by adding5 ml of dry pentane, stirring the slurry gently for 30 min, allowing thecatalyst to settle, and finally removing pentane by syringe and dryingthe solid under argon flow for 3 h.

Preparation of Silica Supported Metallocene Catalyst (Silica-CE2)

Preparation was carried out as for catalyst Silica-IE2 but using 32 mgof metallocene MC-CE2

Preparation of Silica Supported Metallocene Catalyst (Silica-CE1)

Preparation was carried out as for catalyst Silica-IE2 but using 30 mgof metallocene MC-CE1

The available composition data of the catalysts from ICP are listed inTable 1.

TABLE 1 Composition data of the catalysts used in this investigation ZrAl Al/Zr MC Catalyst MC (wt %) (wt %) (molar) (wt %) Silica-CE2 MC-CE20.20 14.8 250 1.69 Silica-CE1 MC-CE1 0.18 14.8 280 1.63 Silica-IE1MC-IE1 0.27 17.7 220 2.57 Silica-IE2 MC-IE2 0.19 15.3 270 1.69

Polymerisation Examples

Homopolymerisation of Propylene with Unsupported Metallocenes

The polymerisations were performed in a 5 L reactor. 200 μl oftriethylaluminum was fed as a scavenger in 5 mL of dry and degassedpentane. The desired amount of hydrogen was then loaded (measured inmmol) and 1100 g of liquid propylene was fed into the reactor. Thetemperature was set to 20° C. The desired amount of catalyst (5 to 15mg) in 5 mL of PFC is flushed into the reactor with a nitrogenoverpressure. After 5 minutes prepolymerisation, the temperature israised to 70° C. over a period of 15 minutes. The polymerisation isstopped after 60 minutes by venting the reactor and flushing withnitrogen before the polymer is collected. Polymerisation conditions andresults are disclosed in Table 2.

C₃/C₂ Random Copolymerisation with Unsupported Metallocenes

The polymerisations were performed in a 5 L reactor. 200 μl oftriethylaluminum was fed as a scavenger in 5 mL of dry and degassedpentane. The desired amount of hydrogen (6 mmol) was then loaded and1100 g of liquid propylene was fed into the reactor. Desired amount ofethylene was fed in to the reactor. The temperature was set to 30° C.The desired amount of catalyst (5 to 20 mg) in 5 mL of PFC is flushedinto the reactor with a nitrogen overpressure. The temperature is thenraised to 70° C. over a period of 15 minutes. The polymerisation isstopped after 30 minutes by venting the reactor and flushing withnitrogen before the polymer is collected.

The catalyst activities were calculated on the basisof the 60 minute(homopolymerisation of propylene) or 30 minute (C₃/C₂ randomcopolymerisation) period according to the following formula:

${{Catalyst}{{Activity}{}\left( {\text{kg-}{PP}\text{/g-}{Cat}\text{/h}} \right)}} = \frac{{amount}{of}{polymer}{produced}({kg})}{{catalyst}{loading}{(g) \times {polymerisation}}{time}(h)}$

Polymerisation results of C₃/C₂ random copolymerisations are collectedin Table 3.

Performance of the inventive examples with comparison to the closestreferences is summarised in FIGS. 1-5. The best overall performanceisobtained with the new metallocenes of the invention: high activity inhomopolymerisation and in C₃/C₂ random copolymerisation, goodhomopolymer melting temperature and good molecular weight capability.Most importantly, ethylene has a strong positive effect on Mw with thecatalysts of the invention.

Polymer Analysis

TABLE 2 Propylene homopolymerisation in liquid propylene. Polymerisationtime 60 minutes. Tp = 70° C. Catalyst Amt H2 Yield Activity Metalactivity Mw Tm 2, 1e Mmmm Run # (mg) (mmol) (g) (kg-PP/g-Cat/h)(kg-PP/g-Zr/h) (kg/mol) Mw/Mn (° C.) (%) (%) IE 1.1 9.1 6 372 40.8 15128516 2.5 150.9 0.96 99.59 IE 2.1 9.1 6 322 39.7 15266 514 2.6 150.4 0.9399.70 IE 3.1 7.7 6 250 32.5 12493 510 2.7 150.8 0.91 99.61 IE 3.1b 6.7 6463 69.1 13926 521 2.5 156.4 — — CE 1.1 9.8 6 479 48.8 13956 472 2.2149.4 1.09 99.77 CE 2.1 10.0 6 298 29.8 7268 486 2.3 146.9 n.d n.d. CE3.1 10.0 6 269 26.9 6720 418 2.3 151.0 0.92 99.38 CE 4.1 8.7 6 213 24.47409 233 2.8 156.2 0.54 99.44

TABLE 3 Ethylene-propylene random copolymerisations (with hydrogen, 6mmol). Polymerisation time 30 minutes. Tp = 70° C. Catalyst Amt C2 YieldActivity Metal activity Mw Tm NMR Ce Run # (mg) (mmol) (g)(kg-PP/g-Cat/h) (kg-PP/g-Zr/h) (kg/mol) Mw/Mn (° C.) (wt.-%) IE 1.2 7.550.0 247. 66.1 24464 702 2.6 119.4 4.22 IE 3.2 8.1 50.0 433. 107.0 41149720 2.7 121.4 4.06 CE 1.2 7.6 49.9 199 52.4 14962 517 2.4 120.3 4.15 CE2.2 15.0 49.9 236 31.4 7665 504 2.6 119.3 3.58 CE 3.2 8.7 50.0 85 19.64908 297 2.4 124.3 3.55 CE 4.2 9.1 50.5 176 38.6 11688 246 2.3 113.45.17

Polymerisation Examples with Offline Prepolymerised Catalyst.

Off-Line Prepolymerization (“Prepping”) Procedure

The CE5 catalyst was pre-polymerised according to the followingprocedure: Off-line pre-polymerisation experiment was done in a 125 mLpressure reactor equipped with gas-feeding lines and an overheadstirrer. Dry and degassed perfluoro-1.3-dimethylcyclohexane (15 cm³) andthe desired amount of the catalyst (CE5, 398.7 mg) to be pre-polymerisedwere loaded into the reactor inside a glove box and the reactor wassealed. The reactor was then taken out from the glove box and placedinside a water cooled bath kept at 25° C. The overhead stirrer and thefeeding lines were connected and stirring speed set to 450 rpm. Theexperiment was started by opening the propylene feed into the reactor.The total pressure in the reactor was raised to about 5 barg and heldconstant by propylene feed via mass flow controller until the targetdegree of polymerisation was reached. The reaction was stopped byflashing the volatile components. Inside glove box, the reactor wasopened and the content poured into a glass vessel. Theperfluoro-1.3-dimethylcyclohexane was evaporated until a constant weightwas obtained to yield 1.8057 g of the pre-polymerised catalyst.

The catalysts listed in the table 4 below were prepolymerised asdescribed in the above procedure.

TABLE 4 prepolymerisation of catalysts (pp = offline prepolymerised)Catalyst weighed Prep-degree (g- Catalyst-name amount (mg) Yield (g)Pol/g-Cat) ppCE5 398.7 1.8057 3.5 ppCE6 393.3 1.6514 3.2 ppCE1b 400.31.8622 3.7 ppCE7 399.5 1.7488 3.4 ppIE1 399.5 1.8154 3.5 ppIE3 408.61.8096 3.4 ppIE2 402.0 1.6670 3.2

The polymers have been produced in a 20-L reactor following threedifferent procedures, as described in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Polymerisation procedures bulk GP1 GP2 T H2 Time P T Time H2 P TTime C2/C3 procedure steps ° C. NL min barg ° C. min NL barg ° C. minwt/wt 1 2 80 1.5 ~40 20 70 ~70 0.25 2 3 80 1.5 40 24 80 60 1.2 20 70 900.25 3 3 80 1.5 40 24 80 60 1.2 20 70 90-120 1.00

The details of the polymerisation procedures are described in thefollowing:

Procedure 1: 2-Step Polymerisation

Step 1: Prepolymerisation and Bulk Homopolymerisation

A 21.2 L stainless-steel reactor containing 0.4 barg propylene wasfilled with 3950 g propylene. Triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/lsolution in heptane) was injected into the reactor by additional 240 gpropylene. The solution was stirred at 20° C. and 250 rpm for at least20 min. The catalyst was injected as described in the following. Thedesired amount of solid, prepolymerised catalyst was loaded into a 5 mlstainless steel vial and a second 5 ml vial containing 4 ml n-heptanewas added on top inside a glovebox. Then the vial on top was pressurizedwith 10 bars of nitrogen and attached to the autoclave. The valvebetween the two vials was opened and the solid catalyst was contactedwith n-heptane under nitrogen pressure for 2 s, and then flushed intothe reactor with 240 g propylene. The prepolymerisation was run for 10min. At the end of the prepolymerisation step the temperature was raisedto 80° C. When the internal reactor temperature has reached 71° C., 1.5NL of H2 was added via mass flow controller in one minute. The reactortemperature was held constant at 80° C. throughout the polymerisation.The polymerisation time was measured starting when the internal reactortemperature reached 2° C. below the set polymerisation temperature.

Jacket T constraints: during the transition between prepolymerisationand target reactor temperature, the jacket temperature is controlledwith a cooling device (HB-Therm). The set temperature limits to preventoverheating of the reactor were:

dTSW: Defines the maximum temperature of the jacket liquid

Set=max10° C. >target temperature

dTIW: Defines the maximum temperature difference between jacket andreactor during heating .

Set=max35° C. >actual temperature

Step 2: Gas Phase C₃C₂ r-PP.Polymerisation

Afterthe bulk step was completed, the stirrer speed was reduced to 50rpm and the pressure was reduced down to 0.3 bar-g by venting themonomers. Then triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/l solution inheptane) was injected into the reactor by additional 250 g propylenethrough a steel vial. The pressure was then again reduced down to 0.3bar-g by venting the monomers. The stirrer speed was set to 180 rpm andthe reactor temperature was set to 70° C. Then the reactor pressure wasincreased to 20 bar-g by feeding a C₃/C₂ gas mixture (C₂/C_(3=0.74)wt/wt). Pressure and temperature were held constant by feeding via massflow controller a C₃/C₂ gas mixture (of composition corresponding to thetarget polymer composition) and by thermostat, until the set time forthis step had expired.

Then the reactor was cooled down (to about 30° C.) and the volatilecomponents flashed out. After flushing the reactor 3 times with N2 andone vacuum/N2 cycle, the product was taken out and dried overnight in afume hood. 100 g of the polymer is additivated with 0.5 wt % IrganoxB225 (solution in acetone) and dried overnight in a hood followed by 2hours in a vacuum drying oven at 60° C.

Jacket T constraints. During the transition between bulk and gas phasetemperature, the jacket temperature is controlled with a cooling device(HB-Therm). The set temperature limits to prevent overheating of thereactor were:

dTSW: Defines the maximum temperature of the jacket liquid

Set=max10° C. >target temperature

dTIW: Defines the maximum temperature difference between jacket andreactor during heating .

Set=max35° C. >actual temperature.

Procedure 2: 3-step polymerisation

Step 1: Prepolymerisation and Bulk Homopolymerisation

Step 1 was performed as described in procedure 1 above.

Step 2: Gas Phase Homopolymerisation

Afterthe bulk step was completed, the stirrer speed was reduced to 50rpm and the pressure was reduced to 23 bar-g by venting the monomer.Afterwards the stirrer speed was set to 180 rpm, the reactor temperatureto 80° C. and the pressure to 24 bar-g. Hydrogen (1.2 NL) was added viaflow controller in one minute. During the gas phase homopolymerisation,both pressure and temperature have been held constant via mass flowcontroller (feeding propylene) and thermostat for 60 minutes.

Step 3: Gas Phase Ethylene Propylene Copolymerisation

Step 3 was performed as step 2 of procedure 1 described above.Differences: Feeding a C₂/C₃ gas mixture of C₂/C_(3=0.56)(wt/wt) in thetransition. Polymerisation in this step was run for 90 min.

Procedure 3: 3-Step Polymerisation

Step 1: Prepolymerisation and Bulk Homopolymerisation

The autoclave containing 0.4 barg propylene was filled with 3970 gpropylene. Triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/l solution inheptane) was injected into the reactor by additional 240 g propylene.The solution was stirred at 20° C. and 250 rpm for at least 20 min. Thecatalyst was injected as described in the following. The desired amountof solid, prepolymerised catalyst was loaded into a 5 ml stainless steelvial and a second 5 ml vial containing 4 ml n-heptane was added on topinside a glovebox. Then the vial on top was pressurized with 10 bars ofnitrogen and attached to the autoclave. The valve between the two vialswas opened and the solid catalyst was contacted with n-heptane undernitrogen pressure for 2 s, and then flushed into the reactor with 240 gpropylene. The prepolymerisation was run for 10 min. At the end of theprepolymerisation step the temperature was raised to 80° C. When theinternal reactor temperature has reached 71° C., 1.5 NL of H2 was addedvia mass flow controller in three minutes. The reactor temperature washeld constant at 80° C. throughout the polymerisation. Thepolymerisation time was measured starting when the internal reactortemperature reached 2° C. below the set polymerisation temperature.

Jacket T constraints. During the transition between prepolymerisationand target reactor temperature, the jacket temperature is controlledwith a cooling device (HB-Therm). The set temperature limits to preventoverheating of the reactor were:

dTSW: Defines the maximum temperature of the jacket liquid

Set=max10° C. >target temperature

dTIW: Defines the maximum temperature difference between jacket andreactor during heating .

Set=max35° C. >actual temperature

Step 2: Gas Phase Homopolymerisation

Afterthe bulkstep was completed, the stirrer speed was reduced to 50 rpmand the pressure was reduced to the desired gas phase pressure.(=targetpressure-0.5) by venting the monomer. Afterwards the stirrer speed wasset to 180 rpm, the reactor temperature to 80° C. and the pressure to24barg. The desired amount of hydrogen was added via flow controller.During the gas phase homopolymerisation, both target pressure andtemperature have been held constant via mass flow controller (feedingpropylene) and thermostat until the runtime for this step was expired.

Step 3: Gas Phase C₃C₂ r-PP.Polymerisation

Afterthe first gasphase step was completed, the stirrer speed wasreduced to 50 rpm and the pressure was reduced down to 0.3 barg byventing the monomers. Then triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/lsolution in heptane) was injected into the reactor by additional 250 gpropylene through a steel vial. The pressure was then again reduced downto 0.3 barg by venting the monomers. The stirrer speed was set to 180rpm and the reactor temperature was set to 70° C. Then the reactorpressure was increased to 20 bar-g by feeding a C₃/C₂ gas mixture(C₂/C_(3=2.22) wt/wt). Pressure and temperature were held constant byfeeding via mass flow controller a C₃/C₂ gas mixture (of compositioncorresponding to the target polymer composition) and by thermostat,until the set time for this step had expired.

Then the reactor was cooled down (to about 30° C.) and the volatilecomponents flashed out. After purging the reactor 3 times with N2 andone vacuum/N2 cycle, the product was taken out and dried overnight in afume hood. 100 g of the polymer is additivated with 0.5 wt % IrganoxB225 (solution in acetone) and dried overnight in a hood followed by onehour in a vacuum drying oven at 60° C.

Jacket T constraints. During the transition between bulk and first gasphase and first and second gasphase, the jacket temperature iscontrolled with a cooling device (HB-Therm). The set temperature limitsto prevent overheating of the reactor were:

dTSW: Defines the maximum temperature of the jacket liquid

Set=max10° C. >target temperature

dTIW: Defines the maximum temperature difference between jacket andreactor during heating .

Set=max35° C. >actual temperature.

Results are set out in tables 6 to 8.

TABLE 6 Two-step polymerisations (procedure 1), result summaryMetallocene MC-CE1 MC-CE5 MC-CE6 MC-IE1 MC-IE2 Catalyst ppCE1b ppCE5ppCE6 ppIE1 ppIE2 MFR whole material 9.4 5 16 4 2.5 XS_(gravim) 57 64 5263 54 C2(XS) 24.8 27.3 27.1 27.7 24.4 iV_(EPR) 1.6 1.9 1.6 2.3 2.3

TABLE 7 Three-step polymerisations (procedure 2), result summaryMetallocene MC-CE1 MC-CE7 MC-IE3 MC-IE2 Catalyst ppCE1b ppCE7 ppIE3ppIE2 MFR whole material 9 14 9 6 Split bulk-GP1-GP2 50-35-15 43-32-2539-32-29 38-36-26 (calc with MFC) XS_(gravim) (XS_(Crystex)) 19 (17) 31(28) 31 (30) 27 (26) C2(XS) 21.4 20.9 21.6 20.8 iV_(EPR) 1.6 1.9 2.3 2.4

TABLE 8 Three-step polymerisations (procedure 3), result summaryMetallocene MC-CE1 MC-IE1 MC-IE3 MC-IE2 Catalyst ppCE1b ppIE1 ppIE3ppIE2 MFR whole material 9.6 18.6 21.4 9.4 Split bulk-GP1-GP2 45-37-1840-40-20 39-43-18 44-37-19 (calc with MFC) XS_(gravim) (XS_(Crystex)) 20(20) 20 (20) 17 (18) 20 (20) C2(XS) 47.9 47.0 47.6 47.3 iV_(EPR) 1.7 2.12.0 2.2

The results clearly indicate that the catalysts ppIE1, ppIE2, and ppIE3produce heterophasic copolymers having a rubber phase with a highermolecular weight than the heterophasic copolymers produced under similarconditions with the comparison catalysts.

The Mw/Mn of the matrix produced in the three-step experiments rangesfrom 4.5 to 6.2.

The need for a cyclopentyl ring condensed on one of the indenes is shownby comparing the iV(EPR) of the heterophasic copolymer obtained with CE1or CE7 to those obtained with the three inventive metallocenes (Tables6-8).

Polymerisation Procedure for 1-Step Homopolymerisation hPP in Bulk (5Litre Reactor) Using Unsupported Metallocene Catalyst 1E4

Polymerisation Procedure

The polymerisations were performed in a 5 L reactor. 200 μl oftriethylaluminum was fed as a scavenger in 5 mL of dry and degassedpentane. The desired amount of hydrogen was then loaded (mmol, see Table9) and 1100 g of liquid propylene was fed into the reactor. Thetemperature was set to 20° C. The desired amount of catalyst (5 to 15mg) in 5 mL of PFC is flushed into the reactor with a nitrogenoverpressure. After 5 minutes prepolymerisation, the temperature israised to 70° C. over a period of 15 minutes. The polymerisation isstopped after 60 minutes by venting the reactor and flushing withnitrogen before the polymer is collected.

The catalyst activity was calculated based on the 60 minute period at70° C. according to the following formula:

${{Catalyst}{{Activity}{}\left( {\text{kg-}{PP}\text{/g-}{Cat}\text{/h}} \right)}} = \frac{{amount}{of}{polymer}{produced}({kg})}{{catalyst}{loading}{(g) \times {polymerisation}}{time}(h)}$

Polymerisation results are collected in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Results for homopolymerisation in liquid propylene experimentsand for the polymer characterisation. Polymerisation time 60 minutes. Tp= 70 °C. Activity Catalyst H2 Yield (kg-PP/g- MFR21 Catalyst (mg) (mmol)(g) Cat/h) (g/10 min) Tm (° C.) IE4 13.7 1 244.4 17.8 4.64 155.4 IE4 9.06 329.5 36.6 72.1 156.7

Polymerisation Procedure for 2-Step hPP in Bulk+Gas Phase ExperimentsUsing Silica Supported Metallocenes

Step 1: Prepolymerisation and Bulk Homopolymerisation

A 20.9 L stainless-steel reactor containing 0.4 bar-g propylene wasfilled with 3950 g propylene. Triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/lsolution in heptane) was placed into a stainless steel vial and injectedinto the reactor by means of a flow of 240 g propylene. 2.0 NL of H2 wasadded via mass flow controller in one minute. The solution was stirredat 20° C. and 250 rpm for at least 20 min. The catalyst was injected asdescribed in the following. The desired amount of solid, prepolymerisedcatalyst was loaded into a 5 ml stainless steel vial inside a gloveboxand a second 5 ml vial containing 4 ml n-heptane pressurized with 10bars of nitrogen was added on top of the first vial. This catalystfeeder system was mounted on a port on the lid of the reactor, the valvebetween the two vials was opened and the solid catalyst was contactedwith heptane under nitrogen pressure for 2 s, and then flushed into thereactor with 240 g propylene. The prepolymerisation was run for 10 min.At the end of the prepolymerisation step the temperature was raised to80° C. The reactor temperature was held constant at 80° C. throughoutthe polymerisation. The liquid propylene polymerisation was run for 40minutes. The polymerisation time was measured starting when the internalreactor temperature reached 2° C. below the set polymerisationtemperature.

Step 2: Gas Phase Homopolymerisation

Afterthe bulk step was completed, the stirrer speed was reduced to 50rpm and the pressure was reduced to 23.5 bar-g by venting the monomer.Afterwards the stirrer speed was set to 180 rpm, the reactor pressurewas set at 24 bar-g while keeping the reactor temperature at 80° C., and2.0 NL hydrogen were added via flow controller in 4 minutes. The gasphase homopolymerisation was run for 60 minutes, while keeping thepressure constant by feeding propylene via mass flow controller and thetemperature constant at 80° C. by thermostat.

The 2-step hPP in bulk+ gas phase polymerisation results with the SiO2supported catalysts and metallocenes CE1, CE2, 1E2 are listed in Table10 and Table 11. FIG. 6 shows the results graphically.

TABLE 10 2-step homopolymerisation experiments: settings and results.Prepoly 10 min, all H2 fed before prepoly; Bulk step at 80° C., 40 min;Gas phase step at 80° C., 24 bar-g. Time MC from Time amount 20° C. fromC3fed Powder Catalyst in to bulk to in GP Total Overall Bulk GP1 bulkamount catalyst 80° C. GP (MFC) yield productivity Split split MFR2density Catalyst mg mg min min g g kg/g_(cat) kg/g_(MC) wt % wt % g/10min g/cm³ Silica 113 1.91 18 11 195 2158 19 1130 77 23 1.9 0.49 CE2Silica 79 1.29 18 15 364 1585 20 1231 77 23 2.6 0.47 CE1 Silica 55 0.9322 5 302 1571 29 1690 81 19 2.8 0.46 IE2

TABLE 11 2-step homopolymers: analytics XS T_(m) M_(n) M_(w) catalyst(wt %) (° C.) (g/mol) (g/mol) M_(w)/M_(n) Silica CE2 0.4 150 96200335000 3.5 Silica CE1 0.2 151 89250 311500 3.5 Silica IE2 0.3 154 71000304000 4.3

Polymerisation Procedure for 3-Step Heterophasic PP/EPR (Bulk+GasPhase+Gas Phase) Experiments with Silica Supported Metallocenes

Step 1: Prepolymerisation and Bulk Homopolymerisation

A 20.9 L stainless-steel reactor containing 0.4 bar-g propylene wasfilled with 3950 g propylene. Triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62 mol/lsolution in heptane) was placed into a stainless steel vial and injectedinto the reactor by means of a flow of 240 g propylene. 2.0 NL of H2 wasadded via mass flow controller in one minute. The solution was stirredat 20° C. and 250 rpm for at least 20 min. The catalyst was injected asdescribed in the following. The desired amount of solid, prepolymerisedcatalyst was loaded into a 5 ml stainless steel vial inside a gloveboxand a second 5 ml vial containing 4 ml n-heptane pressurized with 10bars of nitrogen was added on top of the first vial. This catalystfeeder system was mounted on a port on the lid of the reactor, the valvebetween the two vials was opened and the solid catalyst was contactedwith heptane under nitrogen pressure for 2 s, and then flushed into thereactor with 240 g propylene. The prepolymerisation was run for 10 min.At the end of the prepolymerisation step the temperature was raised to80° C. The reactor temperature was held constant at 80° C. throughoutthe polymerisation. The liquid propylene polymerisation was run for 30minutes. The polymerisation time was measured starting when the internalreactor temperature reached 2° C. below the set polymerisationtemperature.

Step 2: Gas Phase Homopolymerisation

Afterthe bulk step was completed, the stirrer speed was reduced to 50rpm and the pressure was reduced to 23.5 bar-g by venting the monomer.Afterwards the stirrer speed was set to 180 rpm, the reactor pressurewas set at 24 bar-g while keeping the reactor temperature at 80° C., and2.0 NL hydrogen were added via flow controller in 4 minutes. The gasphase homopolymerisation was run for 40 minutes, while keeping thepressure constant by feeding propylene via mass flow controller and thetemperature constant at 80° C. by thermostat.1

Step 3: Gas Phase Ethylene Propylene Copolymerisation

Afterthe gas phase homopolymerisation step was completed, the stirrerspeed was reduced to 50 rpm and the pressure was reduced down to 0.3bar-g by venting the monomers. Then triethylaluminum (0.80 ml of a 0.62mol/l solution in heptane) was injected into the reactor by additional250 g propylene through a steel vial. The pressure was then againreduced down to 0.3 bar-g by venting the monomers. The stirrer speed wasset to 180 rpm and the reactor temperature was set to 70° C. Then thereactor pressure was increased to 20 bar-g by feeding a C₂/C₃ gasmixture (C₂/C_(3=0.56) wt/wt). The temperature was held constant bythermostat and the mposition C₂/C_(3=0.25) wt/wt for a set time (valuesin table 6).

Then the reactor was cooled down to about 30° C. while the volatilecomponents were flashed out. After purging the reactor 3 times with N2and one vacuum/N2 cycle, the product was taken out and dried overnightin a fume hood. 100 g of the polymer was additivated with 0.5 wt %Irganox B225 (solution in acetone) and dried overnight in a hoodfollowed by 2 hours in a pressure was held constant by feeding via massflow controller a C₃/C₂ gas mixture of covacuum drying oven at 60° C.

The 3-step heterophasic copolymers have been produced in threepolymerisation steps: hPP in bulk at 80° C., hPP in gas phase at 80° C.,24 bar-g, then a C₂/C₃ copolymerisation in gas phase at 70° C., 20bar-g, without adding H2. The polymerisation results with the SiO2/MAOcatalysts based on Asahi Sunspera DM-L-33-C₁ silica and metallocenesMC-CE2, MC-CE2, MC-IE1 and MC-IE2 are listed in table 12 and Table 13.

TABLE 12 3-step heterophasic copolymerisation experiments: settings andresults. Prepoly 10 min, all H2 fed before prepoly; Bulk step at 80° C.,30 min; Gas phase 1 step at 80° C., 40 min, 24 bar-g; Gas phase 2 stepat 70° C., 20 bar-g, no added H2. Transition Transition Transition 20 to80° C. bulk to GP1 GP1 GP1 to GP2 Time (C3) Time of Time of Pre-transition Bulk Propylene transition H2 Propylene transition PropyleneEthylene Catalyst polym. prepoly Total fed in bulk to in fed GP1 to fedin fed in Catalyst amount H2 H2 to bulk H2 transition GP1 GP in GP1 GP2transition transition name mg NL NL min NL g min NL g min g g Silica-118 2,018 0 17 2,018 170 11 2,01 452 7 372 208 CE2 Silica- 80 2,018 0 182,018 80 12 2,01 287 7 378 212 CE1 Silica 56 2,020 1,01 19 3,030 0 73,02 189 7 366 206 IE2 Silica 74 2,019 0 18 2,019 159 21 2,01 372 14 376214 IE1 3-step heterophasic copolymerisation experiments: settings andresults. Prepoly 10 min, all H2 fed before prepoly; Bulk step at 80° C.,30 min; Gas phase 1 step at 80° C., 40 min, 24 bar-g; Gas phase 2 stepat 70° C., 20 bar-g, no added H2. GP2 (C2/C3) Feed Propylene EthyleneC2/C3 Duration fed in fed in in gas Catalyst GP2 GP2 GP2 phase 2 yieldproductivity min g g wt/wt g kg/g cat 90 686 172 0,25 3018 26 90 296 730,25 1831 23 120 178 45 0,25 1465 26 90 259 64 0,25 2295 31

TABLE 13 3-step heterophasic copolymers: analytics powder split split C2bulk split gas gas soluble (FT-IR) MFR2, density bulk phase 1 phase 2fraction T_(m)2 iV(XS) (XS) Catalyst powder g/ml % % % wt % ° C. dl/g wt% Silica-CE2 2,31 0,45 56,6 15,0 28 27,5 150 2,1 19,9 Silica-CE1 0,890,45 64,2 15,7 20 16,7 151 2,4 18,5 Silica IE2 4,3 0,44 71,8 12,9 1511.8 152 3,2 19,2 Silica IE1 5,64 0,44 69,7 16,2 14,1 13,3 153 3,4 20,1

FIG. 7 shows the correlation between ethylene content of the rubberphase (C₂ wt % in xylene soluble fraction) and its molecular weight(intrinsic viscosity). It is apparent that the inventive examples givemuch higher molecular weight compared to the comparative examples at thesame ethylene content in the rubber.

1. A complex of formula (I):

M is Hf or Zr; each X is a sigma ligand; L is a bridge of formula -(ER⁸ ₂)_(y)—; y is 1 or 2; E is C or Si; each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alkyl)silyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl or L is an alkylene group such as methylene or ethylene; Ar and Ar′ are each independently an aryl or heteroaryl group optionally substituted by 1 to 3 groups R¹ or R^(1′) respectively; R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there are four or more R¹ and R¹′ groups present in total, one or more of R¹ and R^(1′) is other than tert butyl; R² and R^(2′) are the same or are different and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl group, C₆₋₁₀ aryl group; each R³ is a —CH₂—, —CHRx— or C(Rx)₂— group wherein Rx is C₁-4 alkyl and where m is 2-6; R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group; R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group; and R⁷ and R⁷ are the same or are different and are H or a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.
 2. A complex as claimed in claim 1, wherein the complex is of formula (Ia)

M is Hf or Zr; each X is a sigma ligand; L is a bridge of formula -(ER⁸ ₂)_(y)—; y is 1 or 2; E is C or Si; each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alkyl)silyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl or L is an alkylene group; each n is independently 0, 1, 2 or 3; R¹ and R¹′ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there are four or more R¹ and R¹′ groups present in total, one or more of R¹ and R^(1′) is other than tert butyl; R² and R^(2′) are the same or are different and are a CH₂-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl group, C₆₋₁₀ aryl group; each R³ is a —CH₂—, —CHRx— or C(Rx)₂— wherein Rx is C₁₋₄ alkyl and where m is 2-6; R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group; R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)₃ group, with R¹⁰ being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group; and R⁷ and R^(7′) are the same or are different and are H or a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.
 3. A complex as claimed in claim 2 wherein L isof formula —SiR⁸2-, wherein each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alkyl)silyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl.
 4. A complex as claimed in claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (Ib):

wherein M is Hf or Zr; each X is a sigma ligand; L is an alkylene bridge or a bridge of the formula —SiR⁸2-, wherein each R⁸ is independently a C₁-C₂₀-hydrocarbyl, tri(C₁-C₂₀-alkyl)silyl, C₆-C₂₀-aryl, C₇-C₂₀-arylalkyl or C₇-C₂₀-alkylaryl; each n is independently 0, 1, 2 or 3; R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆₋₂₀ aryl group with the proviso that if there are four or more R¹ and R¹′ groups present in total, one or more of R¹ and R¹ is other than tert butyl; R² and R² are the same or are different and are a CH2-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl group, C₆₋₁₀ aryl group; R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, C₇₋₂₀ arylalkyl, C₇₋₂₀ alkylaryl group or C₆-C₂₀-aryl group; R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with R′° being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group, and R⁷ and R⁷ are the same or are different and are H or a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group.
 5. A complex according to claim 4 in which each n is 1 or
 2. 6. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (II)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; X is a sigma ligand, preferably each X is independently a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C-1-6 alkoxy group, C₁ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group; L is an alkylene bridge or a bridge of the formula wherein each R⁸ is independently C₁-C₆-alkyl, C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl or C₆-aryl group; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl; R² and R²′ are the same or are different and are a CH2-R⁹ group, with R⁹ being H or linear or branched C₁₋₆-alkyl group; R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with R′° being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group.
 7. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1 wherein the complex isof formula (III)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; each X is a sigma ligand, preferably each X is independently a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C-1-6 alkoxy group, C₄-4 alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group; L is -SiR⁸2-, wherein each R⁸ is C₁₋₆ alkyl or C₃₋₈ cycloalkyl; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl; R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with R′° being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group.
 8. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (IV)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; each X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group; L is —SiR⁸2-, wherein each R⁸ is C₁-4 alkyl or C₅₋₆ cycloalkyl; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl, R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group; and R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with R′° being a linear or branched C₁-C₆ alkyl group.
 9. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (V)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group; L is —SiMe₂; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl, R⁵ is a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkyl group; and R⁶ is a C(R¹⁰)3 group, with R′° being a linear or branched C₁-C₄ alkyl group.
 10. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (VI)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group; L is —SiMe₂; each n is independently 1 or 2; T¹ and R¹ are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₆-alkyl group, group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl; R⁵ is a linear C₁-C₄-alkyl group such as methyl; and R⁶ is tert butyl.
 11. A complex according to any preceding claim of claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (VII)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; X is a hydrogen atom, a halogen atom, C₁₋₆ alkoxy group, C₁₋₆ alkyl, phenyl or benzyl group, especially chlorine; L is —SiMe₂; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently the same or can be different and are a linear or branched C₁-C₄-alkyl group with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl; R⁵ is methyl; and R⁶ is tert butyl.
 12. A complex according to claim 1, wherein the complex isof formula (VIII)

wherein M is Hf or Zr; X is Cl; L is —SiMe₂; each n is independently 1 or 2; R¹ and R^(1′) are each independently methyl or tert butyl with the proviso that if there are four R¹ and R¹′ groups present, all 4 cannot simultaneously be tert butyl, R⁵ is methyl; and R⁶ is tert butyl.
 13. A complex according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the C(4) or C(4′) phenyl rings is 3,5-dimethyl phenyl.
 14. A complex according to claim 1, wherein at least one of the C(4) or C(4′) phenyl rings is 4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl.
 15. A complex according to claim 1, wherein R¹, R^(1′) and each value of n are selected such that the C(4) or C(4′) phenyl rings are 3,5-dimethyl phenyl, 3,5-ditertbutylphenyl and/or 4-(tert-butyl)-phenyl.
 16. A catalyst system comprising: a complex according to claim 1; and (ii) a cocatalyst.
 17. A catalyst system according to claim 16 comprising a boron containing cocatalyst, an A1 cocatalyst or both A1 and B cocatalysts.
 18. A catalyst system as claimed in claim 16 in solid form.
 19. A catalyst system as claimed in claim 18 supported on silica.
 20. A process for the manufacture of a catalyst system as claimed in claim 16, said catalyst system comprising obtaining a complex (i) as claimed in any of claims 1 to 15 and a cocatalyst (ii); said process comprising forming a liquid/liquid emulsion system, which comprises a solution of catalyst components (i) and (ii) dispersed in a solvent in the form of dispersed droplets, and solidifying said dispersed droplets to form solid particles of said catalyst system.
 21. A process as claimed in claim 20 further comprising off line prepolymerisation of the catalyst.
 22. A process for the preparation of a polypropylene homopolymer, a propylene-ethylene copolymer, or a propylene C4-10 alpha olefin copolymer comprising polymerising propylene, propylene and ethylene or proplene and a C4-10 alpha olefin, in the presence of a catalyst system according to claim
 16. 23. A process for the preparation of a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising: (I) polymerising propylene in bulk in the presence of a catalyst as claimed in claim 16 to form a polypropylene homopolymer matrix; (II) in the presence of said matrix and said catalyst and in the gas phase, polymerising propylene and ethylene to form a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising a homopolymer matrix and an ethylene propylene rubber.
 24. A process for the preparation of a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising: (I) polymerising propylene in bulk in the presence of a catalyst as claimed in claim 16 to form a polypropylene homopolymer; (II) in the presence of said homopolymer and said catalyst and in the gas phase, polymerising propylene to form a polypropylene homopolymer matrix; (III) in the presence said matrix and said catalyst and in the gas phase, polymerising propylene and ethylene to form a heterophasic polypropylene copolymer comprising a homopolymer matrix and an ethylene propylene rubber (EPR).
 25. A process as claimed in claim 23 in which the EPR component is fully soluble in xylene at room temperature.
 26. A process as claimed in claim 23 where the iV of the EPR is above 2.0 dL/g when measured in decaline.
 27. A process as claimed in claim 23 wherein the Mw/Mn of the polypropylene homopolymer matrix component, as measured by GPC, is broader than 3.5.
 28. A process as claimed in claim 23 wherein the Mw/Mn of the polypropylene homopolymer matrix component, as measured by GPC, is 4.0 to 8.0. 